Kat istheSea3 donated @KatistheSea3
02 September, 02:03
🪖 Rep. Nadler & Sen. Joni Ernst “not seeking re-election”

#24
Any person making statements they will not be
seeking re-election was put in submission.

👇

9-1-25 🇺🇸 Q The Storm Rider @ Patreon
At this moment there’s Military underneath WA DC
shutting down these satanic ritual places..
the satanic ops of the cabal, deep state, this illuminati,
these diff dark societies
connected to the 33° free masons that created WA DC.
THOSE POWERS WERE BEING CONTROLLED
BY THE VATICAN & LONDON & THE DIST OF COLUMBIA.
SINCE JUNE 14
THE U.S. MIL HAS BEEN GOING TO GEORGETOWN.
Visiting the elites & finding out what’s underground…
THERE ARE PEOPLE THAT WERE ARRESTED
that are now testifying to the satanic rituals under WA DC.
People arrested in this very very rich district,
where the OSS was created.
Where J. Edgar Hoover came from,
GEORGETOWN IN WA DC.
IN THIS AREA, IN GEORGETOWN, PEOPLE WERE ARRESTED
& THEY ENDED UP IN THE TRIBUNALS HAPPENING NOW IN DC 💥

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
George Edmiston @BIGEDWYMANZ
02 September, 05:56
In response Kat istheSea3 to her Publication
GLORIOUS KAT TIMING IS EVERYTHING COINCIDENCE THAT JAG JUST CAME TO TOWN

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
bijowi @bijowi
02 September, 09:47
In response George Edmiston to his Publication
The article is proof that JAG did not go to DC to prosecute civilians. I think the military will be placed in strategic locations to arrest specific people, regardless of when the crime was committed.
Trump, Military Target Obama-Era IRS bosses for Treason | Real Raw News https://share.google/78Ozv...

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
ol_ cowboy @ol_cowboy
03 September, 01:42
In response bijowi to his Publication
Bijowi, did you mean that the Military IS prosecuting Civilians in City of Washington?

I agree with you that MILITARY IS EVERYWHERE, holding Tribunals in strategic locations.
JAG CORPS IS EVERYWHERE.
EVEN ON US NAVY SHIPS OFF THE COASTS OF VARIOUS COUNTRIES - HOLDING TRIBUNALS.
(According to Jan Halper-Hays and Lt. Col. Riccardo Bosi)

PLENTY OF YARD ARMS!

and Darn Tootin' Civilians can be subject to US MILITARY COURTS-MARTIAL.

I'll let Lt. Col. Riccardo Bosi explain that one:

https://www.bitchute.com/v...

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
bijowi @bijowi
03 September, 07:21
In response ol_ cowboy to his Publication
I haven't read the current Manual for Courts-Martial, but I will. What I was referring to is this statement in the article: "You’re being detained as an enemy combatant; you have no right,” one of the JAG agents told her.
I believe that is the reason Lindsey Graham asked Brett Kavanaugh about civilian vs military laws and enemy combatants.
There are so many things happening right now, its hard to keep up. Thank you for the video! That is what this platform is all about, i.e. keeping us all informed. Knowledge is power! 🧠 💪💥

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
ol_ cowboy @ol_cowboy
03 September, 10:27
In response bijowi to his Publication
Yes, and Bijowi you are totally correct referring to the conversation between Kavanaugh and Graham - THAT WAS TELLING THESE VERMIN WHAT WAS COMING (but the Cabalistas were probably not paying attention.)

Civilians can absolutely be subject to The Laws Of Armed Conflict taking them into the system of Military Justice (1775) which is Superior to Civilian Law. We had Military Law & Regulation before we even had a Country or a Constitution.

Then, in addition to the AUMF 2001, we have always been under Martial Law since the Civil War since that was never rescinded, either.

This Enemy is in a really, super bad position all the way around. Fooked.

Here it is on C-Span:
https://www.c-span.org/cli...

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
bijowi @bijowi
03 September, 06:48
In response ol_ cowboy to his Publication
I understand that, as anons, we should decern what is true and what is false. My concern is, the United States fraudulently became a corporation in 1871. Since fraud vitiates everything, can we use AUMF 2001, since it was passed by the corporation? I don't think we can pick and choose what is vitiated. I'm not sure if the 2nd Declaration of Independence, signed on July 4, 2020, is true or not. There are mistakes in it, but is this one a draft copy?

https://acrobat.adobe.com/...

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
ol_ cowboy @ol_cowboy
2 of 3

Then, when OUR SIDE'S Military Occupation took back control of America, the way I read the Laws of Warfare (our side being the occupiers of the Corporation) it would up to the Military to decide what Laws, Legislation, Statutes, Functions of the Corporation it would allow & enforce, and which ones it wouldn't, during the time of Military Occupation and under Continuity Of Government (COG) to attain Enduring Constitutional Government or ECG.

i.e. - THE TRANSITION PERIOD UNDER MILITARY OCCUPATION.

So yes, Fraud Vitiates Everything and I think eventually all legislation (or perhaps all extra-Constitutional legislation) will be invalidated from 1871 to Present, but how we get there I believe is up to the Military Planners during the Military Occupation.

So I think during Military Occupation the Military CAN pick and choose what Laws of the Corporation it wants to use during Continuity Of Government to achieve ECG or Enduring Constitutional Government per Laws of Warfare
02:46 AM - Sep 04, 2025 (E)
In response bijowi to his Publication
Only people mentioned by ol_cowboy in this post can reply

No replys yet!

It seems that this publication does not yet have any comments. In order to respond to this publication from ol_ cowboy, click on at the bottom under it