CO2 is a greenhouse gas, though. Even if it wasn't, it would be a weak argument because its increasing abundance in the atmosphere would still be a major problem, as it also causes ocean acidification.

I'm not by any means refuting that academia is in dire need of systemic changes. That doesn't change the fact that CO2 being GHG is one of the least disputable claims in this whole dilemma. What makes you think it's not? Can you back that up with something?

Yes for sure When the levels were MUCH higher than now we had something called Giants, Giant reptiles giant trees giant plants. But that is a rabbit hole you'll have to go down yourself to believe. And trust me when I say it will kick cognitive dissonance in the ass. I am working on getting my database back on line I can gladly show you the things intentionally hidden to push a narrative. I have and do archive everything offline. Things like the documented and filmed creation of the cave paintings to push the caveman story. the documented and filmed creation of Stonehenge. Origins of all the megalithic structures around the world including thousands of star forts. And that the great wall of china was built not to protect china but to contain and protect from china. For over 60 years I have seen the same bullshit stories about how we are doomed by our environment
If we don't get our world population low enough so the few can play emperor and enslave us. That is the true goal.