Robert Wakefield
@Robertauthor
01 August, 10:29
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
HOW DO YOU CATCH A FISH? = BAIT
Perhaps China is playing their part in "the movie"--saying they will take Pelosi out will give TPTB the chance to take her out. She's been as much of a bumbling idiot as Biden. The TPTB could take the bait and take Pelosi out, and blame it on China to start a war.
They've come to realize they won't "win" the White House again--or we can say be "allowed" to win the White House again.
I find it odd the drop number for this is #1847 --the year of 1847 is when Yerba Buena, CA was renamed to San Francisco--which is Pelosi's congressional district.
If she's removed then the House must hold votes for a new SoTH, perhaps the Q team has "plant"s on the Dems side and is waiting for this vote to shift SoTH to the Republicans. They used the lefts weak emotions against them and got them to vote for some "plants" that'll pull off their duties according to the plan.
Leads me to the most recent Q post #4958 & #4957
Perhaps China is playing their part in "the movie"--saying they will take Pelosi out will give TPTB the chance to take her out. She's been as much of a bumbling idiot as Biden. The TPTB could take the bait and take Pelosi out, and blame it on China to start a war.
They've come to realize they won't "win" the White House again--or we can say be "allowed" to win the White House again.
I find it odd the drop number for this is #1847 --the year of 1847 is when Yerba Buena, CA was renamed to San Francisco--which is Pelosi's congressional district.
If she's removed then the House must hold votes for a new SoTH, perhaps the Q team has "plant"s on the Dems side and is waiting for this vote to shift SoTH to the Republicans. They used the lefts weak emotions against them and got them to vote for some "plants" that'll pull off their duties according to the plan.
Leads me to the most recent Q post #4958 & #4957
10:30 AM - Aug 01, 2022
In response Robert Wakefield to his Publication
Only people mentioned by Robertauthor in this post can reply
