21 July, 08:36
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
(1) Ironacally, as a result, the patriot act was formed allowing the establishment to bypass congress in matters of national security.
But why is so much of the Patriot act about the crackdown on drug cartels?
The Soviet Union tried to take over afghanistan in the 70's.
Rumor has it, to establish a pipeline of trade to the middle East.
The Towers are hit, a Saudi family member of the Bin Laden family is implicated as the culprit, and picks Afghanistan as "The place" to hide out.
Didn't the Bush family conduct 7 plus or minus % of their business dealings with the Bin Laden family?
Strange "coincidence", one would surmise.
The Bush establishment then proceeds to take over Afghanistan as a result of a need for National security at the cost of Billions upon Billions of $ for not only the US nut many other Countries as well.
A President is "elected" (Installed?) in Afghanistan.
His brother "appears to Contol" the drug trade over there>
But why is so much of the Patriot act about the crackdown on drug cartels?
The Soviet Union tried to take over afghanistan in the 70's.
Rumor has it, to establish a pipeline of trade to the middle East.
The Towers are hit, a Saudi family member of the Bin Laden family is implicated as the culprit, and picks Afghanistan as "The place" to hide out.
Didn't the Bush family conduct 7 plus or minus % of their business dealings with the Bin Laden family?
Strange "coincidence", one would surmise.
The Bush establishment then proceeds to take over Afghanistan as a result of a need for National security at the cost of Billions upon Billions of $ for not only the US nut many other Countries as well.
A President is "elected" (Installed?) in Afghanistan.
His brother "appears to Contol" the drug trade over there>
12:29 PM - Jul 21, 2022
In response Martin Geddes to his Publication
Only people mentioned by KarlWiggins in this post can reply