Martin Geddes donated @martingeddes
02 April, 06:28
Anonup is raising interesting issues about social media for me. It appears to be remarkable well "weeded" of trolls and bots. The audience is high level, loving, and erudite. There's none of the anger of Gab or idiocy of Twatter.

I post some things to Gab because I don't feel they do much for people here (e.g. article links with a pull quote). Some stuff like my photos it would be nice to have a mechanism to push to both. Anonup is like your peers and bosses are watching, so you had better put out quality stuff.

The one downside I see of a niche social media platform is you don't so easily get to promote people and content from obscurity as a "big name". Once I had 100k+ followers on Twatter I could magically direct attention to videos etc. For someone who had sung a special song, say, and put it on YouTube those thousand views would make their day and week.

Sometimes quality and quantity are in tension; other times not. One public square, or many?

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Boudiccea17 @Boudiccea17
@htgthelapis said it best imho:
"But no city has only one square."
07:53 AM - Apr 02, 2022
In response Martin Geddes to his Publication
Only people mentioned by Boudiccea17 in this post can reply

No replys yet!

It seems that this publication does not yet have any comments. In order to respond to this publication from Boudiccea17 , click on at the bottom under it