Somethings are just too good to be true, right?

Be leery or be fooled.

I tell myself that every day.

No doubt. I myself am struggling with wondering how much 'alternative information' is actually source-able, much less truth. I keep falling back into considering 'their' resources, why would they not have their hands into and be controlling of the alternative narrative? Considering their all-encompassing desire for control.

Is the above quote one that is inserted to discredit the truth seeker? Does it sound reasonable enough or most likely true to the truth seeker that if a trusted source propagates it, they then consider that it must be true w/o sourcing or in some instances, self validating the information? How might bots be involved with the spread?

I know this has been considered here before and pointed out. This just jumped out at me and I felt like it needed a look and un surprisingly enough, a source is not easily found.

I will also note that your statement is how some of us are viewing Q, not that we dont want it to be true, just that if we let ourselves be fooled, the end result will be intolerable for more than just ourselves. Not to beat a dead or unwelcome horse, just making a point.