Robert Wakefield
@Robertauthor
07 October, 12:44
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
SPORTS
@SPORTS
07 October, 02:45
In response Robert Wakefield to his Publication
All the talk and decodes and rallies and pontificating got old about a year ago.
TIME TO END THIS IDIOTIC, MORONIC, MOTHER FUCKING PLAN TODAY!
TIME TO END THIS IDIOTIC, MORONIC, MOTHER FUCKING PLAN TODAY!
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Only people mentioned by Robertauthor in this post can reply
SPORTS
@SPORTS
07 October, 03:21
In response Robert Wakefield to his Publication
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Robert Wakefield
@Robertauthor
07 October, 03:45
In response SPORTS to his Publication
Somethings are just too good to be true, right?
Be leery or be fooled.
I tell myself that every day.
No doubt. I myself am struggling with wondering how much 'alternative information' is actually source-able, much less truth. I keep falling back into considering 'their' resources, why would they not have their hands into and be controlling of the alternative narrative? Considering their all-encompassing desire for control.
Is the above quote one that is inserted to discredit the truth seeker? Does it sound reasonable enough or most likely true to the truth seeker that if a trusted source propagates it, they then consider that it must be true w/o sourcing or in some instances, self validating the information? How might bots be involved with the spread?
I know this has been considered here before and pointed out. This just jumped out at me and I felt like it needed a look and un surprisingly enough, a source is not easily found.
Be leery or be fooled.
I tell myself that every day.
No doubt. I myself am struggling with wondering how much 'alternative information' is actually source-able, much less truth. I keep falling back into considering 'their' resources, why would they not have their hands into and be controlling of the alternative narrative? Considering their all-encompassing desire for control.
Is the above quote one that is inserted to discredit the truth seeker? Does it sound reasonable enough or most likely true to the truth seeker that if a trusted source propagates it, they then consider that it must be true w/o sourcing or in some instances, self validating the information? How might bots be involved with the spread?
I know this has been considered here before and pointed out. This just jumped out at me and I felt like it needed a look and un surprisingly enough, a source is not easily found.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396