🪖 Rep. Nadler & Sen. Joni Ernst “not seeking re-election”

#24
Any person making statements they will not be
seeking re-election was put in submission.

👇

9-1-25 🇺🇸 Q The Storm Rider @ Patreon
At this moment there’s Military underneath WA DC
shutting down these satanic ritual places..
the satanic ops of the cabal, deep state, this illuminati,
these diff dark societies
connected to the 33° free masons that created WA DC.
THOSE POWERS WERE BEING CONTROLLED
BY THE VATICAN & LONDON & THE DIST OF COLUMBIA.
SINCE JUNE 14
THE U.S. MIL HAS BEEN GOING TO GEORGETOWN.
Visiting the elites & finding out what’s underground…
THERE ARE PEOPLE THAT WERE ARRESTED
that are now testifying to the satanic rituals under WA DC.
People arrested in this very very rich district,
where the OSS was created.
Where J. Edgar Hoover came from,
GEORGETOWN IN WA DC.
IN THIS AREA, IN GEORGETOWN, PEOPLE WERE ARRESTED
& THEY ENDED UP IN THE TRIBUNALS HAPPENING NOW IN DC 💥

GLORIOUS KAT TIMING IS EVERYTHING COINCIDENCE THAT JAG JUST CAME TO TOWN

The article is proof that JAG did not go to DC to prosecute civilians. I think the military will be placed in strategic locations to arrest specific people, regardless of when the crime was committed.
Trump, Military Target Obama-Era IRS bosses for Treason | Real Raw News https://share.google/78Ozv...

Bijowi, did you mean that the Military IS prosecuting Civilians in City of Washington?

I agree with you that MILITARY IS EVERYWHERE, holding Tribunals in strategic locations.
JAG CORPS IS EVERYWHERE.
EVEN ON US NAVY SHIPS OFF THE COASTS OF VARIOUS COUNTRIES - HOLDING TRIBUNALS.
(According to Jan Halper-Hays and Lt. Col. Riccardo Bosi)

PLENTY OF YARD ARMS!

and Darn Tootin' Civilians can be subject to US MILITARY COURTS-MARTIAL.

I'll let Lt. Col. Riccardo Bosi explain that one:

https://www.bitchute.com/v...

I haven't read the current Manual for Courts-Martial, but I will. What I was referring to is this statement in the article: "You’re being detained as an enemy combatant; you have no right,” one of the JAG agents told her.
I believe that is the reason Lindsey Graham asked Brett Kavanaugh about civilian vs military laws and enemy combatants.
There are so many things happening right now, its hard to keep up. Thank you for the video! That is what this platform is all about, i.e. keeping us all informed. Knowledge is power! 🧠 💪💥

Yes, and Bijowi you are totally correct referring to the conversation between Kavanaugh and Graham - THAT WAS TELLING THESE VERMIN WHAT WAS COMING (but the Cabalistas were probably not paying attention.)

Civilians can absolutely be subject to The Laws Of Armed Conflict taking them into the system of Military Justice (1775) which is Superior to Civilian Law. We had Military Law & Regulation before we even had a Country or a Constitution.

Then, in addition to the AUMF 2001, we have always been under Martial Law since the Civil War since that was never rescinded, either.

This Enemy is in a really, super bad position all the way around. Fooked.

Here it is on C-Span:
https://www.c-span.org/cli...

I understand that, as anons, we should decern what is true and what is false. My concern is, the United States fraudulently became a corporation in 1871. Since fraud vitiates everything, can we use AUMF 2001, since it was passed by the corporation? I don't think we can pick and choose what is vitiated. I'm not sure if the 2nd Declaration of Independence, signed on July 4, 2020, is true or not. There are mistakes in it, but is this one a draft copy?

https://acrobat.adobe.com/...

Here is what I believe is a pertinent Chapter of the DOD LAW OF WAR MANUAL that allows the Occupier to pick and choose:

11.8 ADMINISTRATION OF OCCUPIED TERRITORY

11.8.1 Paramount Authority of the Occupying Power Over Government Functions in Occupied Territory. The functions of the hostile government—whether of a general, provincial,
or local character—continue only to the extent they are sanctioned by the Occupying Power.

11.8.2 Continued Performance of Duties by Civil Servants and Other Officials of Local Governments. The Occupying Power may, while retaining its paramount authority, permit the government of the country to perform some or all of its normal functions. It may, for example, call upon the local authorities to administer designated rear areas, subject to the guidance and direction of the Occupying Power. Such action is consistent with the status of occupation, so long as there exists the firm possession of territory and the purpose to maintain paramount authority...

I can understand what you're saying. It all makes sense and it might seem that I have blinders on, but the Department of Defense (DoD) Law of War Manual was first published in June 2015. I understand that Trump, Q-team, Military Alliance and the Little Light Cube are using [their] own laws against [them] and it has to be done "by the book". I can't grasp the "vitiates everything", because "the book" was written after the United States, Inc. was established.
My wife has told me that I have a way of making things seem more difficult because of the way I think. She says I can make difficult things seem simple, and simple things seem difficult while arriving at the correct conclusion.
From this point forward, I will disregard the idea of vitiating everything and continue to Trust the Plan. I'm going to relax and watch a baseball game. ⚾ 😃