CM_ Patriot
@IMPatriotRU
08 July, 03:18
eff kash and bongino and their swearing that there is no epstein client list
I think Trump wants us to demand the information
I think Trump wants us to demand the information
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Mike Schwenk
@Mike314
08 July, 03:25
In response CM_ Patriot to her Publication
All part of the script.
Bongino was secret service, and instead of doing the right thing, he has probably withheld tons of dirt that he has on the political elite.
Don't forget that Bongino became irritated when he was asked about Zero's $65,000 pizza and hotdog party at the Whitehouse.
Bongino was secret service, and instead of doing the right thing, he has probably withheld tons of dirt that he has on the political elite.
Don't forget that Bongino became irritated when he was asked about Zero's $65,000 pizza and hotdog party at the Whitehouse.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
More than likely Bongino and many others had to sign a NDA. Either the NDA's have to expire or be reversed and made illegal in certain circumstances.
05:45 PM - Jul 08, 2025
In response Mike Schwenk to his Publication
Only people mentioned by Totter in this post can reply
Plassstic Man
@Plasssticman
09 July, 01:20
In response Pink Totter to her Publication
The giant fallacy of any NDA is that it is a contract. And any contract that requires a party to ignore a crime is null and void. Witnessing a crime and then doing nothing is aiding and abetting, making the silent party a participant in the crime.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Pink Totter
@Totter
09 July, 02:49
In response Plassstic Man to his Publication
Agree, although we have no idea of the NDA he may have signed. Imagine for his position it would be very detailed about what can and can't be disclosed under the implication of national security.
Thought I read somewhere that NDA's were no longer legal if it involved children... or is that yet to come? Those that thought they were/are safe because of witnesses signing an NDA will be in a panic when that happens.
Thought I read somewhere that NDA's were no longer legal if it involved children... or is that yet to come? Those that thought they were/are safe because of witnesses signing an NDA will be in a panic when that happens.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
