Dale Bradburn
@Seekeroftruth1776
18 March, 06:06
1939 CANCER ACT — Illegal to cure CANCER.
Passed by Parliament in England.
This was also being applied by the U.S.
Did you know that under the 1939 Cancer Act, it's actually a criminal offense for medical practitioners to even advise patients on potential cancer cures?
This raises the question: wouldn't it be considered fraudulent for cancer charities to accept donations under the assumption that they are searching for a cure, when it's actually a criminal act for them to publicize such cures?
It's still in effect today, and medical practitioners have been prosecuted for attempting to cure cancer. In the England, some have even been jailed for doing so.
https://www.legislation.go...
Passed by Parliament in England.
This was also being applied by the U.S.
Did you know that under the 1939 Cancer Act, it's actually a criminal offense for medical practitioners to even advise patients on potential cancer cures?
This raises the question: wouldn't it be considered fraudulent for cancer charities to accept donations under the assumption that they are searching for a cure, when it's actually a criminal act for them to publicize such cures?
It's still in effect today, and medical practitioners have been prosecuted for attempting to cure cancer. In the England, some have even been jailed for doing so.
https://www.legislation.go...
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
I think it may be a case of semantics. Ever notice how they say they're "raising awareness for" cancer.
That's what 'Susan G. Komen for the Cure' does. They "raise awareness for breast cancer." As a friend was asked me, "Don't you think everyone is already AWARE of cancer?"
They've infiltrated the schools and do these fundraisers at just about every girls sport. So "Komen for the Cure" has thousands of kids out there soliciting donations for something people feel guilty for if they don't support it. Pretty ingenious way to get a lot of strangers to send you money.
per web: Komen only devotes 20.9 percent of the donations it receives to researching breast cancer. The rest of their funding goes towards administrative costs and raising “awareness,” i.e. devoting money to advertising the Susan G. Komen for the Cure org.
That's what 'Susan G. Komen for the Cure' does. They "raise awareness for breast cancer." As a friend was asked me, "Don't you think everyone is already AWARE of cancer?"
They've infiltrated the schools and do these fundraisers at just about every girls sport. So "Komen for the Cure" has thousands of kids out there soliciting donations for something people feel guilty for if they don't support it. Pretty ingenious way to get a lot of strangers to send you money.
per web: Komen only devotes 20.9 percent of the donations it receives to researching breast cancer. The rest of their funding goes towards administrative costs and raising “awareness,” i.e. devoting money to advertising the Susan G. Komen for the Cure org.
08:13 PM - Mar 18, 2025
In response Dale Bradburn to his Publication
Only people mentioned by Pike_Bishop in this post can reply
Sheila Abrams
@Peeved_Patriot
19 March, 08:48
In response Pike Bishop to his Publication
I will never donate to the American Cancer Society again, nor the Red Cross, nor UNICEF, nor any charity. Seems they are all just money launderers.
Ivermectin and fenbendazole have been working for stage IV cancer, so no more donations. Parasite sacs, not tumors.
Ivermectin and fenbendazole have been working for stage IV cancer, so no more donations. Parasite sacs, not tumors.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
