mark kub
@markkub
23 December, 08:53
That original ruling came down to dollars and cents, when the city of New London, New York, used eminent domain to confiscate a home belonging to Susan Kelo to give it to Pfizer for one of its business operations.
She sued, but the Supreme Court said a procedure to use eminent domain "to transfer land from private owner to another private owner" did not violate the Constitution. https://www.wnd.com/2024/1...
She sued, but the Supreme Court said a procedure to use eminent domain "to transfer land from private owner to another private owner" did not violate the Constitution. https://www.wnd.com/2024/1...
'Wildly off-base': New push for Supreme Court to reverse case that allows property confiscation * WorldNetDaily * by Bob Unruh
The U.S. Supreme Court bizarrely ruled in 2005, in the Kelo case, that a government could take privately owned property from one owner to give it to another, just, well, just because.
https://www.wnd.com/2024/12/wildly-off-base-new-push-for-supreme-court-to-reverse-case-that-allows-property-confiscation/Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Only people mentioned by Robino in this post can reply
