Defense says only hacking charge has any merit in any basic sense and even then they would invoke article of the ECHR over time already served. (Assange has been imprisoned for years now without charge in HMP Belmarsh,*after having won his case he was denied bail anyways).
Defense then argues that the court cannot prosecute the press for a source acting illegally.
Defense also points out that prosecution failed to mention re: names published in leaks, that a media partner leaked document passwords, and Assange actually reached out to the State department for help redacting names, but was rebuffed and ignored by them. https://t.me/ETheFriend/47...
Defense then argues that the court cannot prosecute the press for a source acting illegally.
Defense also points out that prosecution failed to mention re: names published in leaks, that a media partner leaked document passwords, and Assange actually reached out to the State department for help redacting names, but was rebuffed and ignored by them. https://t.me/ETheFriend/47...
Telegram: Contact @ETheFriend
Assage Trial Live: Day 2 cont. Defense has summary remarks. Says US prosecution is relying on the extradition treaty while at the same time attempting to ignore article 5 of it (no political extradition). And they are pretending to guarantee safety while their heads of state have plotted to murde..
https://t.me/ETheFriend/4779
11:51 AM - Feb 21, 2024
Only people mentioned by Strat247 in this post can reply
