27 January, 08:32
There must be an ethical foundation to being a "white hat". Is it that you...
- Must violate the free will of those who violate the free will of others
- Must not violate the free will of those who have the option to be sufficiently informed of the dangers of their choices
- Must take a "do unto others" approach in the grey area in the middle, guiding people away from danger and towards safety, but not taking on their karma
???
What is the foundation that keeps this all lawful in the widest scale and scope?
- Must violate the free will of those who violate the free will of others
- Must not violate the free will of those who have the option to be sufficiently informed of the dangers of their choices
- Must take a "do unto others" approach in the grey area in the middle, guiding people away from danger and towards safety, but not taking on their karma
???
What is the foundation that keeps this all lawful in the widest scale and scope?
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
I think sometimes, they have to triage - what direction will cause the least amount of harm, but still keep the troops going in the right direction.
The white hats want us all to gain our individual power back - decentralized power is the overall aim - they are not working towards power for a few - which is the black hats aim.
The white hats want us all to gain our individual power back - decentralized power is the overall aim - they are not working towards power for a few - which is the black hats aim.
08:38 AM - Jan 27, 2023
In response Martin Geddes to his Publication
Only people mentioned by Tallyho in this post can reply
