Dale Bradburn
@Seekeroftruth1776
16 November, 05:19
https://www.supremecourt.g...
https://www.supremecourt.g...
Uh, guys... a Supreme Court case regarding the 2020 election just hit the docket
> it involves the possible removal of a sitting President and Vice President of the United States along with members of the United States Congress
> This action is against 388 federal officers in their official capacities which include President Joseph Robinette Biden Jr, Vice President Kamala Harris, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and former Vice President Michael Richard Pence (“Respondents”)
continued in comments.....
https://www.supremecourt.g...
Uh, guys... a Supreme Court case regarding the 2020 election just hit the docket
> it involves the possible removal of a sitting President and Vice President of the United States along with members of the United States Congress
> This action is against 388 federal officers in their official capacities which include President Joseph Robinette Biden Jr, Vice President Kamala Harris, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and former Vice President Michael Richard Pence (“Respondents”)
continued in comments.....
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Dale Bradburn
@Seekeroftruth1776
16 November, 05:19
In response Dale Bradburn to his Publication
Check the document for the full list.
Also, it is about the congress ignoring over one hundred claimants, on J6, that the election was rigged. They did not investigate the claim, as they should have, and installed Biden. Under the constitution this is treasonous, as they were aiding the enemy.
> When the allegations of a rigged election came forward the Respondents had a duty under law to investigate it or be removed from office
Also, it is about the congress ignoring over one hundred claimants, on J6, that the election was rigged. They did not investigate the claim, as they should have, and installed Biden. Under the constitution this is treasonous, as they were aiding the enemy.
> When the allegations of a rigged election came forward the Respondents had a duty under law to investigate it or be removed from office
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Who would remove them if they fail to investigate and prosecute?
As DC is not part of the States, appears to function under different laws, and, the DC police appear to be working with the enemy, does this then mean the military must invade DC, and remove them?
I am fuzzy on the rules surrounding this, and as it seems we have been stymied at every turn, that is why I ask.
As DC is not part of the States, appears to function under different laws, and, the DC police appear to be working with the enemy, does this then mean the military must invade DC, and remove them?
I am fuzzy on the rules surrounding this, and as it seems we have been stymied at every turn, that is why I ask.
08:17 AM - Nov 16, 2022
In response Dale Bradburn to his Publication
Only people mentioned by Tallyho in this post can reply
