01 August, 07:34
So if the jabbed are spike protein factories, does that mean they should no longer be living with and caring for children? And what about jabbed children? Are they a threat to unjabbed adults? Do we have a "jab apartheid" coming? Unjabbed shop in the morning, jabbed in the afternoon?
This is not an abstract concern in my case.
This is not an abstract concern in my case.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
It's not just spike protein. The jabbed are also exhaling and sweating graphene.
This is the real reason the 'equal rights for the non-jabbed' lawsuits happened. Now, the non-jabbed are forced to uptake the toxins. There really isn't any escape if one wants to be part of society. All we can do is try to stay as healthy as possible.
Maybe we can all go live on an island...
This is the real reason the 'equal rights for the non-jabbed' lawsuits happened. Now, the non-jabbed are forced to uptake the toxins. There really isn't any escape if one wants to be part of society. All we can do is try to stay as healthy as possible.
Maybe we can all go live on an island...
10:34 AM - Aug 01, 2022
In response Martin Geddes to his Publication
Only people mentioned by Watermark in this post can reply
