Martin Geddes donated @martingeddes
15 May, 07:03
It was dissecting 9/11 that got me into this "conspiracy" stuff (around 2010). Too many anomalies for the official story to be credible:
- Missing planes
- Missing rubble and dustification of towers
- Molten rock
- Eyewitness reports of bombs plus visual evidence of explosions
- Ignoring WTC6 and 7
- Ignoring all expert objections
- Ignoring the money
- Cameras turned off
- Immediate patsy on offer
- Timeline messed up
- "Convenient" excuses for absence on day by powerful
- Insurance fraud
- Symbolism used
- Foreshadowing in media
- Biased and weak investigation committee
- Convenient excuse for 2 (illegal, profitable) wars

That's just off the top of my head. As with other scams, what's amazing in retrospect is how easily the public are played when they are presented with the same thing in synchrony and want to believe it in order to look respectable.

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Yankee Carolyn @YankeeCarolyn
I was 31 yrs old when it happened. Two weeks before my baby's 1st birthday. So I was home, and my husband worked nights, so he was home. We watched Tv all day and halfway through thst I realized somethjng wasn't right. I didn't quite know it was an inside job, but i suspected bevause the news anchors kept on contradicting themselves and each other.
12:30 AM - May 16, 2022
In response Martin Geddes to his Publication
Only people mentioned by YankeeCarolyn in this post can reply

No replys yet!

It seems that this publication does not yet have any comments. In order to respond to this publication from Yankee Carolyn, click on at the bottom under it