23 March, 10:21
As far as I can tell with my limited understanding and resources, the Q process is designed to be non-violent towards anons. By that I mean we're "necessarily and tolerable and openly disinfo'd" — but we aren't being used in a way that creates material gain for those behind the scenes. We are invited to contribute, but there is no coercion. There are some "tiny traps" to teach us vital lessons (like don't predict dates) but that's done in our (individual and collective) best interest.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
The disinfo in the Q-drops isn't there to put the anons on the wrong foot, but the "enemy" that also reads them, some of the Q-drops can only be fully understood when they happen for the same reason...
Q and Q+ are totally anti violence, the rule of law that's what counts for them, instead of the rule of lies that we see being eliminated as we speak... 🙏
Q and Q+ are totally anti violence, the rule of law that's what counts for them, instead of the rule of lies that we see being eliminated as we speak... 🙏
11:37 AM - Mar 23, 2022
In response Martin Geddes to his Publication
Only people mentioned by Aristarkos in this post can reply
