Only followers of this user (Joey) can see their posts

Plassstic Man @Plasssticman
28 January, 04:19
In response Joey DarktoLight to his Publication
because we are the bloodline of Abel

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Jan Jackson * * * @Jan_Jackson
28 January, 07:12
In response Plassstic Man to his Publication
Abel didn't have a bloodline. His brother killed him.

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Plassstic Man @Plasssticman
28 January, 07:51
In response Jan Jackson * * * to her Publication
Shem then?

Sure doesn't seem like we are of Cain.

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Jan Jackson * * * @Jan_Jackson
Well, let's go back to the beginning. Besides Cain, there was Seth. Then, the flood came and whisked everyone away except for Noah, his wife, his sons, and his daughters-in-law. Noah surely would have been of the line of Seth. Most likely, his family members would also have been descendants of Seth. Even his daughters-in-law, though we don't know for sure.

Shem was one of Noah's three sons. It is thought that Ham was black, Shem was Semitic, and Japheth was light-skinned. The word Semitic comes from the name Shem.

The most important thing to remember is not so much the DNA of a person but the SPIRIT of a person. Even if every single descendant of Cain was taken away in the flood, the spirit of Cain (being all about one's self) can arise in anyone.

Example: Gideon was a very righteous man whom God chose to war against the Midianites with 300 men. After Gideon died, his son, Abimelech, was EVIL. Even within a nuclear family, there can be good and evil. Each person chooses.
08:00 PM - Jan 28, 2022
In response Plassstic Man to his Publication
Only people mentioned by Jan_Jackson in this post can reply

No replys yet!

It seems that this publication does not yet have any comments. In order to respond to this publication from Jan Jackson * * *, click on at the bottom under it