P
L
A
U
S
I
B
L
E

D
E
N
I
A
L

I hate to break up the party but I was thinking of this very concept as it pertains to Trump "touting" the vaccines. Though he may have been speaking of the HCQ variety, he didn't seem to indicate a difference. Many supporters have expressed anger about this. While his talk may have trapped the evil POS's, did it also trap innocents? I took his pre-rally survey and, in the section where I could mention additional and more specific communication, I asked him to TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT THE VACCINES.

Yes, my daughter is a virtual-signaling Libtard who would have taken the jab regardless; she certainly didn't take it because of anything Trump said. But will my grandson become an orphan?

I just don't like that Trump "played a part" in a chess game; not this part anyway. Will he have a plausible explanation for having done so?

Red October is quite a sad October for me.

The MRNA Jab is technically speaking NOT a vaccine.

It can not be called a Vaccine because it does not use the virus itself to create anti-bodies. It's a genetic enhancer.

Only the media and the liars are calling it that. Trump was not referencing the same thing that the media was.