nO_JaB_ happaflapp @happaflapp
04 August, 12:01

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
WIPatriot IRL @QualityorQuantity
04 August, 12:16
In response nO_JaB_ happaflapp to his Publication
I don't want all 50 states to be audited. It would take to damn long.

I am thinking August 15th would be a good day to end this shit show. Why? Because Nixon ended dollar convertibility to gold on August 15 in 1971.

If we are going to counter their dates with dates then why not get rid of o'Biden and bring back the gold standard on the 15th of August?

Isn't that the directions we are supposed to be heading?

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
nO_JaB_ happaflapp @happaflapp
04 August, 11:51
In response WIPatriot IRL to her Publication
Audit the 5 "swing states". AZ, GA, PA, WI, and MI.

The other 4 states will go much faster once fraud is proved in AZ. Also, after Lindell's cyber symposium, I think it will expedite said audits.

After Bidan's presidency is confirmed to be the fraudulent. Audit the other states. Fraud exists in every state in the union.

This is bigger than Trump! The fraud goes back to other elections. How many other elections were fraudulent?
2018? Think AOC had a ground swell of support in NY?
2016? "They" never thought she'd lose
2014? How many congress members are actually legit?
2012? Did Obama actually win?

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
WIPatriot IRL @QualityorQuantity
05 August, 01:10
In response nO_JaB_ happaflapp to his Publication
I agree that the fraud is rampant and throughout the US.

Past year's can be reviewed after o'Biden is decertified and we get on with the BEST part of this show.

The de-certification would open the door for past year's to be audited. Won't most of the legislature end up getting arrested if they haven't been already. That would trigger new elections with the quantum voting system used to secure the elections.

Just my opinion. I realize they will do what they will do no matter how much collateral damage is suffered by the innocent.

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
nO_JaB_ happaflapp @happaflapp
05 August, 11:29
In response WIPatriot IRL to her Publication
I think pretty close here.

All we have is speculation at this point in the show. But, this is always the best part of any movie. Watching the bad guy evil scheme falling part, and the good guy getting justice!

Not sure which would end up being a better voting system. Block-chain or the Quantum voting. I haven't seen either in action, so I can't speak to either.

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
WIPatriot IRL @QualityorQuantity
Isn't quantum voting base on blockchain technology?

Electronic voting · Quantum computation · Blockchain
09:08 AM - Aug 06, 2021
In response nO_JaB_ happaflapp to his Publication
Only people mentioned by QualityorQuantity in this post can reply
nO_JaB_ happaflapp @happaflapp
07 August, 12:29
In response WIPatriot IRL to her Publication
Yea, blockchain is electronic. But, I don't know how it relates to quantum computing. I was under the impression that quantum computing was a ways off for that sort of use. I have always thought that quantum computing was still in the experimental stage. The step beyond quantum computing was/is project looking glass.

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
WIPatriot IRL @QualityorQuantity
07 August, 10:52
In response nO_JaB_ happaflapp to his Publication
I just did a quick search 'for quantum computing is here' and this article came up.

https://www.honeywell.com/...

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396