Hammurabi (Eye for an Eye)
@i4ni2th4a2th
20 April, 10:09
Things are about to get VERY STRANGE.
(Like... Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds...
Picture yourself in a boat on a river...
by the Beatles STRANGE)
As the judge said the trial can (and now probably will) be (eventually) overturned because of Maxine Water’s statements (Watch the Water) and that was BEFORE JBDN publicly announced (practically threatening jurors) which way he thought it should go (towing the official cabal approved party line).
There has to be a trigger (maybe sentencing)?
“We're looking for a guilty verdict (or else)."
- Waters
“Maxine Waters May have given the defense basis to overturn the entire trial on.”
- Judge Cahill (Chauvin Trial Arbiter)
“Maxine (Waters) stupid.”
- Q
RES IPSA LOQUITUR.
(Like... Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds...
Picture yourself in a boat on a river...
by the Beatles STRANGE)
As the judge said the trial can (and now probably will) be (eventually) overturned because of Maxine Water’s statements (Watch the Water) and that was BEFORE JBDN publicly announced (practically threatening jurors) which way he thought it should go (towing the official cabal approved party line).
There has to be a trigger (maybe sentencing)?
“We're looking for a guilty verdict (or else)."
- Waters
“Maxine Waters May have given the defense basis to overturn the entire trial on.”
- Judge Cahill (Chauvin Trial Arbiter)
“Maxine (Waters) stupid.”
- Q
RES IPSA LOQUITUR.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
i to look that up :: RES IPSA LOQUITOR
Legal definition of res ipsa loquitur: a doctrine or rule of evidence in tort law that permits an inference or presumption that a defendant was negligent in an accident injuring the plaintiff on the basis of circumstantial evidence if the accident was of a kind that does not ordinarily occur in the absence of negligence.
i still don't quite understand (i understand the first part of the definition but not "if the accident was of a kind that does not ordinarily occur in the absence of negligence" )
i have a deep psychological block to understanding legalese jargon because i despise the judical system
Legal definition of res ipsa loquitur: a doctrine or rule of evidence in tort law that permits an inference or presumption that a defendant was negligent in an accident injuring the plaintiff on the basis of circumstantial evidence if the accident was of a kind that does not ordinarily occur in the absence of negligence.
i still don't quite understand (i understand the first part of the definition but not "if the accident was of a kind that does not ordinarily occur in the absence of negligence" )
i have a deep psychological block to understanding legalese jargon because i despise the judical system
04:10 PM - Apr 21, 2021
In response Hammurabi (Eye for an Eye) to his Publication
Only people mentioned by Nunyaeffinbizness in this post can reply
