18 February, 11:58
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Paul Atreides
@Terrible_Resolve
19 February, 12:19
In response Kim Runner to her Publication
This is easily tested & falsifiable. The Electron is the lightest stable subatomic particle known. It carries a negative charge of 1.602176634 × 10−19 coulomb, which is considered the basic unit of electric charge. The rest mass of the electron is 9.1093837015 × 10−31 kg, which is only 1/1,836the mass of a proton. An electron is therefore considered nearly massless in comparison with a proton or a neutron, & the electron mass is not included in the mass number of an atom. EVERYTHING IN THE UNIVERSE EXHIBITS WAVE|PARTICLE DUALITY. What in meditation allows for the manipulation of matter?
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Both of you are falling in the same trap. Models are representative, not prescriptive. And so, they can help us understand or predict reality but they can never be used as a truth-maker as to what is real or not.
If you encounter a phenomena that is hard (or impossible) to be nicely integrated in the model, it does not mean that it is not real. The predictive accuracy or weakness of a model has no impact on the fact that this phenomena exists.
Again, it is real independently of the models you use to understand the world.
If you encounter a phenomena that is hard (or impossible) to be nicely integrated in the model, it does not mean that it is not real. The predictive accuracy or weakness of a model has no impact on the fact that this phenomena exists.
Again, it is real independently of the models you use to understand the world.
12:55 AM - Feb 19, 2021
In response Paul Atreides to his Publication
Only people mentioned by JohnTiger in this post can reply
