18 February, 11:58
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
This is easily tested & falsifiable. The Electron is the lightest stable subatomic particle known. It carries a negative charge of 1.602176634 × 10−19 coulomb, which is considered the basic unit of electric charge. The rest mass of the electron is 9.1093837015 × 10−31 kg, which is only 1/1,836the mass of a proton. An electron is therefore considered nearly massless in comparison with a proton or a neutron, & the electron mass is not included in the mass number of an atom. EVERYTHING IN THE UNIVERSE EXHIBITS WAVE|PARTICLE DUALITY. What in meditation allows for the manipulation of matter?
12:19 AM - Feb 19, 2021
In response Kim Runner to her Publication
Only people mentioned by Terrible_Resolve in this post can reply
Brock Malky
@Netttrunner
19 February, 04:53
In response Paul Atreides to his Publication
measure love?
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Paul Atreides
@Terrible_Resolve
19 February, 07:17
In response Brock Malky to his Publication
Love is selfless and can be deemed limitless. As humans, however, we are imperfect and may not reflect the God's perfrction of expressing love. Howver, as with snything that deal with homo sapiens sapiens there are metrics that can be applied.
One way to measure love is to look at behaviors that people engage in to express love. Chapman (1995) theorized that there were five broad classes of behaviors that people would engage in to express love: (1) words of affirmation, (2) spending quality time, (3) giving gifts, (4) acts of service, and (5) physical touch.
Goff, Goddard, Pointer, and Jackson (2007) developed a survey instrument to measure expressions of love. They created a series of questions that were designed to measure one (and only one) of the different behaviors that Chapman laid out. These involved asking questions about how a lover does things. This attempt at "gotcha" when it comes to science and love is an old trope and stereotypical. It is easily rebutted.
One way to measure love is to look at behaviors that people engage in to express love. Chapman (1995) theorized that there were five broad classes of behaviors that people would engage in to express love: (1) words of affirmation, (2) spending quality time, (3) giving gifts, (4) acts of service, and (5) physical touch.
Goff, Goddard, Pointer, and Jackson (2007) developed a survey instrument to measure expressions of love. They created a series of questions that were designed to measure one (and only one) of the different behaviors that Chapman laid out. These involved asking questions about how a lover does things. This attempt at "gotcha" when it comes to science and love is an old trope and stereotypical. It is easily rebutted.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
John Tiger
@JohnTiger
19 February, 12:55
In response Paul Atreides to his Publication
Both of you are falling in the same trap. Models are representative, not prescriptive. And so, they can help us understand or predict reality but they can never be used as a truth-maker as to what is real or not.
If you encounter a phenomena that is hard (or impossible) to be nicely integrated in the model, it does not mean that it is not real. The predictive accuracy or weakness of a model has no impact on the fact that this phenomena exists.
Again, it is real independently of the models you use to understand the world.
If you encounter a phenomena that is hard (or impossible) to be nicely integrated in the model, it does not mean that it is not real. The predictive accuracy or weakness of a model has no impact on the fact that this phenomena exists.
Again, it is real independently of the models you use to understand the world.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
