Sent from a friend, since I'm no longer on T. Could THIS be what we are waiting for?? 😉

What makes this any different than the other SCOTUS cases? Just asking.

ALL the courts refused to see ANY evidence and refused to even take the cases. Because of what happened in Myanmar, our military paused the plan and, I'm assuming here, they must have approached the courts with the Insurrection Act filing and all the irrefutable evidence of fraud AND the fraud and corruption of the judges and said "We know what you did, you will be found guilty. If you refuse the cases, your sentence is life (either execution or life in prison). . .but if you take the cases and rule properly, you'll get a reduced sentence."

Great explanation, and thanks for responding. I just was trying to figure out the difference between THEN and NOW. The stakes and evidence are much stronger now. Really, in my opinion, the courts would be the safest way to protect outrage against DJT.

You are correct Patriot Party. No matter what, though, hard-core libtards are going to absolutely lose their shit when Trump re-takes office. But when they see the evidence of such shit as the trafficking, the murders, the theft, the truth about Bin Laden, the twin towers, WTC 7, the pedophilia, they're gonna cry for several hours, just like the rest of us did.

"I told you so," is going to be a very hard statement for them to accept.