ol_ cowboy
@ol_cowboy
07 November, 10:42
Happy 7-11 Day.
That's reportedly how many Books of the Bible are missing from our current versions out of the total of 777 Books that constitute our real Bible, which were locked away in the Archives of the Vatican, and were unedited BTW still written in Aramaic and hopefully being translated for all of us to spend years reading.
That's reportedly how many Books of the Bible are missing from our current versions out of the total of 777 Books that constitute our real Bible, which were locked away in the Archives of the Vatican, and were unedited BTW still written in Aramaic and hopefully being translated for all of us to spend years reading.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
wht 2.0
@wht
07 November, 11:51
In response ol_ cowboy to his Publication
Doesn't this notion, quite popular in some circles, suggest that the RCC (the power on this earth clearly identified in the sister prophetic books of Daniel and Revelation as the little horn/antichrist/beast) is more powerful than God?
Should we really believe that God wouldn't (and couldn't?!) watch over His WORD to protect it, keeping ALL of it's *essential* doctrines, history, and prophesies "profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness" unto salvation fully intact and available to His children?
That idea just seems silly to me.
Whose interests would that idea actually serve? Couldn't be God's as it makes Him appear weak and not in charge of His own book.
Who would be interested in making the Bible appear insufficient for our edification unto salvation and thus enticing as many as possible to then goosechase all manner of "secret" "hidden" books and "knowledge"?
Didn't the serpent in the garden suggest the same idea?
Should we really believe that God wouldn't (and couldn't?!) watch over His WORD to protect it, keeping ALL of it's *essential* doctrines, history, and prophesies "profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness" unto salvation fully intact and available to His children?
That idea just seems silly to me.
Whose interests would that idea actually serve? Couldn't be God's as it makes Him appear weak and not in charge of His own book.
Who would be interested in making the Bible appear insufficient for our edification unto salvation and thus enticing as many as possible to then goosechase all manner of "secret" "hidden" books and "knowledge"?
Didn't the serpent in the garden suggest the same idea?
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
God is Omnipotent so your point is well taken. God has not been weakened, fooled or restrained by anyone or anything. That is an immutable truth about Him. The Bible we have represents what He has protected for thousands of years. He wrote all of the books except the letters published by Paul and apostles. He spoke to each historical and prophetic writer and they wrote what He told them to write. All of the Word is protected by Him, even if it was altered He allowed it for spiritual reasons.
Moreover, the Word has two senses, the literal sense for people on Earth has many scriptures that are impossible to understand; the internal sense for angels in Heaven in the ancient symbolic language of correspondences. Ol cowboy is right saying all will be revealed because God is revealing the angelic meanings now since this country began under Nunc Licet (now it is revealed).
Moreover, the Word has two senses, the literal sense for people on Earth has many scriptures that are impossible to understand; the internal sense for angels in Heaven in the ancient symbolic language of correspondences. Ol cowboy is right saying all will be revealed because God is revealing the angelic meanings now since this country began under Nunc Licet (now it is revealed).
01:09 PM - Nov 08, 2024
In response wht 2.0 to his Publication
Only people mentioned by Anuenue in this post can reply
