I looked at the entire petition. It’s got a lot of gaps and missed an opportunity to reference precedent that would have been really compelling. Most of the petition is unsubstantiated (i.e., no evidence) hyperbole. No justification offered; could easily have done so (there’s documented fraud).

Or, if he had even included the 1877 Hayes-Tilden race (fraud was alleged by a # of states; an Electoral Commission set up, delay in electoral college granted; fraud was confirmed, thus results overturned). By citing it and the fact that Pelosi refused to grant the reasonable request by Sen Cruz (and 100 other members, incl. 11 Senators)...THAT would have been compelling. (Cruz did cite that case in his joint stmt of 1/2/21, btw). Precedent is impo in SCOTUS land.

I wouldn’t be surprised if SCOTUS passes on it, due to that big omission. I hope of course, they do pick it up. And, am aware there are chess moves afoot likely driving things behind the scenes (e.g., timing w/Durham et al)

Maybe you could send this info to the Brunson's?
I'm sure they'd be grateful
for all the expertise help they can get! 😻🙏🏻🕊

We can only hope. 107 said this case is to leverage a KIng on the 5D chess board. Moves and counter moves which serves a purpose. That is all it at this time.

💯 Thanks for the reminder.

I always forget QTeam plays the
"Look here 👀
while we doing something over there" game‼️

Both sides are incredibly sneaky! 🤯😹

👇 The MAGA KING of TROLLING
"It's called we do a little trolling..." 👑🦅🇺🇸

THANK YOU! Been looking for the SCOTUS official and deadlined "Response" all day. Oh, Lord, let not things continue on as they have been for another six months.

Trust The Plan. I certainly do, no matter what.

🙏 Trusting the Plan
takes a whole lotta FAITH
& PATIENCE!! 🕊️💝😹