Kat istheSea3 donated @KatistheSea3
20 February, 07:58
⚖️ SCOTUS BRUNSON DECISION
TOMORROW!! 🙏🏻🕊

🇺🇸 Loy Brunson
DON’T GET DISCOURAGED
if there’s another denial.
The more letters we get the better!
EVERY SINGLE LETTER SCOTUS RECEIVES
IS FILED—THAT’S PART OF HISTORY

🇺🇸 qthestormrider777
PANIC IN DC AS BRUNSON CASE
MAKES MSM NEWS & TRUMP GIVES APPROVAL 👍

If the case doesn't make it into
the Supreme court
Don't be dismayed..... 3rd times a CHARM

→ EVERYTHING IS SETTING UP
FOR NATIONAL ATTENTION

If SCOTUS rules to hear the case
it leads to MILITARY INTERVENTION
& proves there was Foreign Interference
in the U.S. Elections
& Foreign Occupation in the United States
that has captures the government
at the highest levels.

If SCOTUS does NOT rule or take the case
It STILL leads to MILITARY INTERVENTION…

Either way → IT’S GOING MILITARY

🇺🇸⚖️ Juan O Savin
BRUNSON v ADAMS
is a case against 386 persons in Congress
+ Biden, Harris & Pence —
The remedy is
THEY CAN NO LONGER HOLD OFFICE 💥

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Law & Physics @physics171
"Just keep doing the same thing over and over, expecting different results"
Selling unlawful filings, the Brunsons are not following Lawful process, Due process of law.

The courts do not have standing, do not have subject matter jurisdiction.
The Brunson case is a political matter.
The Brunsons are suppose to be taking petitions to the legislative branch of Government, its the law as written.
Letters do not change the judicial branches choice of decision.
It's against the law for the judicial branch to hear the case, goes against a rule of law, the law of the land, the common law (Due Process of Law).
Deron Brunson has already learned what the facts are. Listen to Kirks Law corner, study the actual law.
So many are deceiving others.
08:13 PM - Feb 20, 2023
In response Kat istheSea3 to her Publication
Only people mentioned by physics171 in this post can reply

No replys yet!

It seems that this publication does not yet have any comments. In order to respond to this publication from Law & Physics, click on at the bottom under it