⚖️ SCOTUS BRUNSON DECISION
TOMORROW!! 🙏🏻🕊
🇺🇸 Loy Brunson
DON’T GET DISCOURAGED
if there’s another denial.
The more letters we get the better!
EVERY SINGLE LETTER SCOTUS RECEIVES
IS FILED—THAT’S PART OF HISTORY
🇺🇸 qthestormrider777
PANIC IN DC AS BRUNSON CASE
MAKES MSM NEWS & TRUMP GIVES APPROVAL 👍
If the case doesn't make it into
the Supreme court
Don't be dismayed..... 3rd times a CHARM
→ EVERYTHING IS SETTING UP
FOR NATIONAL ATTENTION
If SCOTUS rules to hear the case
it leads to MILITARY INTERVENTION
& proves there was Foreign Interference
in the U.S. Elections
& Foreign Occupation in the United States
that has captures the government
at the highest levels.
If SCOTUS does NOT rule or take the case
It STILL leads to MILITARY INTERVENTION…
Either way → IT’S GOING MILITARY
🇺🇸⚖️ Juan O Savin
BRUNSON v ADAMS
is a case against 386 persons in Congress
+ Biden, Harris & Pence —
The remedy is
THEY CAN NO LONGER HOLD OFFICE 💥
TOMORROW!! 🙏🏻🕊
🇺🇸 Loy Brunson
DON’T GET DISCOURAGED
if there’s another denial.
The more letters we get the better!
EVERY SINGLE LETTER SCOTUS RECEIVES
IS FILED—THAT’S PART OF HISTORY
🇺🇸 qthestormrider777
PANIC IN DC AS BRUNSON CASE
MAKES MSM NEWS & TRUMP GIVES APPROVAL 👍
If the case doesn't make it into
the Supreme court
Don't be dismayed..... 3rd times a CHARM
→ EVERYTHING IS SETTING UP
FOR NATIONAL ATTENTION
If SCOTUS rules to hear the case
it leads to MILITARY INTERVENTION
& proves there was Foreign Interference
in the U.S. Elections
& Foreign Occupation in the United States
that has captures the government
at the highest levels.
If SCOTUS does NOT rule or take the case
It STILL leads to MILITARY INTERVENTION…
Either way → IT’S GOING MILITARY
🇺🇸⚖️ Juan O Savin
BRUNSON v ADAMS
is a case against 386 persons in Congress
+ Biden, Harris & Pence —
The remedy is
THEY CAN NO LONGER HOLD OFFICE 💥
07:58 PM - Feb 20, 2023
Only people mentioned by KatistheSea3 in this post can reply
Law & Physics
@physics171
21 February, 08:57
In response Kat istheSea3 to her Publication
KIRKS LAW CORNER LLC
Clearly there is a separation of powers. Is it a Political one OR a Judicial one? If it is a Political one, the Judicial Branch lacks ALL Subject Matter Jurisdiction and it rests with the Legislative Branch and then the Executive Branch, more specifically the Commander in-Chief Article II section 3 and Article IV section 4. That is the Letter of the Supreme Law of the Land. This is FORM of Government and who has what Powers and the PROCESS that is due.
Vindicating the public interest is the function of the Congress and the Chief Executive. To allow that interest to be converted into an individual right by a statute denominating it as such and permitting all citizens to sue, regardless of whether they suffered any concrete injury, would authorize Congress to transfer from the President to the courts the Chief Executive's most important constitutional duty, to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed," Art. II, § 3.
Clearly there is a separation of powers. Is it a Political one OR a Judicial one? If it is a Political one, the Judicial Branch lacks ALL Subject Matter Jurisdiction and it rests with the Legislative Branch and then the Executive Branch, more specifically the Commander in-Chief Article II section 3 and Article IV section 4. That is the Letter of the Supreme Law of the Land. This is FORM of Government and who has what Powers and the PROCESS that is due.
Vindicating the public interest is the function of the Congress and the Chief Executive. To allow that interest to be converted into an individual right by a statute denominating it as such and permitting all citizens to sue, regardless of whether they suffered any concrete injury, would authorize Congress to transfer from the President to the courts the Chief Executive's most important constitutional duty, to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed," Art. II, § 3.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Law & Physics
@physics171
21 February, 08:58
Notice: Undefined variable: text_temp in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 175
https://supreme.justia.com...
Justia Law
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555 (1992)
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife: When Congress authorizes private parties to bring claims based on procedural wrongs, these plaintiffs still must show a concrete and imminent injury to establish standing.
Justia Law
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555 (1992)
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife: When Congress authorizes private parties to bring claims based on procedural wrongs, these plaintiffs still must show a concrete and imminent injury to establish standing.
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife :: 504 U.S. 555 (1992) :: Justia US Supreme Court Center
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife: When Congress authorizes private parties to bring claims based on procedural wrongs, these plaintiffs still must show a concrete and imminent injury to establish standing.
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/504/555/Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Victor This Guy
@This_guy
20 February, 10:51
In response Kat istheSea3 to her Publication
Check Mate...cheeky! Wanna play again¿
....im sorry Dave, I cannot do that.🫤💥🏁🤍
Check Mate Cheeky. 👀👏🧐,
...and the name is Don!
Aaaand still Champion of the Universe...
Donald John Trump
(deafening cheers worldwide and throughout time in every Gallaxy)
The crazy thing is...its True. 🤍🏁🤍
....im sorry Dave, I cannot do that.🫤💥🏁🤍
Check Mate Cheeky. 👀👏🧐,
...and the name is Don!
Aaaand still Champion of the Universe...
Donald John Trump
(deafening cheers worldwide and throughout time in every Gallaxy)
The crazy thing is...its True. 🤍🏁🤍
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
20 February, 10:36
In response Kat istheSea3 to her Publication
It would be wonderful for sure,
but I expect that logically even if SCOTUS
plans to eventually do it,
they would most likely want to have
some more public exposure of the evils
thro these Congressional Hearings to
wake up more ppl and substantiate
their move to prevent less ppl thinking
they are just overstepping
their power for power sake.
but I expect that logically even if SCOTUS
plans to eventually do it,
they would most likely want to have
some more public exposure of the evils
thro these Congressional Hearings to
wake up more ppl and substantiate
their move to prevent less ppl thinking
they are just overstepping
their power for power sake.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Law & Physics
@physics171
20 February, 10:30
In response Kat istheSea3 to her Publication
Telegram: Contact @KIRKSLAWCORNER
John Doe 22 hours ago The constitution says "petition the government for redress of grievances" not the legislature - thus the first amendment petition clause operates with respect to all three branches of government, not just the legislature. This is so ignorant. Did you read the entire ..
https://t.me/KIRKSLAWCORNER/1069Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Apryl ⭐️ ⭐️⭐️
@Apryllin
20 February, 08:29
In response Kat istheSea3 to her Publication
Does anyone have the information that was put out on where to send the letters?
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
20 February, 08:40
In response Apryl ⭐️ ⭐️⭐️ to her Publication
Here you go Apryl 🙏🏻
Here's the link
for downloading a copy of
the SCOTUS letter
+ the 2 addresses:
SCOTUS letters
https://brunsonbrothers.co...
Supreme Court Address:
Supreme Court of the United States
1 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20543
Brunson Brothers Address:
Raland J. Brunson
4287 South Harrison Blvd. #132
Ogden, Utah 84403
(if you can throw in $1.00 to the Brunsons
that would be great! ❤️)
Brunson Twitter
https://twitter.com/Brunso...
Brunson Telegram
https://t.me/BrunsonBrothe...
#MiraclesDoHappen
Here's the link
for downloading a copy of
the SCOTUS letter
+ the 2 addresses:
SCOTUS letters
https://brunsonbrothers.co...
Supreme Court Address:
Supreme Court of the United States
1 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20543
Brunson Brothers Address:
Raland J. Brunson
4287 South Harrison Blvd. #132
Ogden, Utah 84403
(if you can throw in $1.00 to the Brunsons
that would be great! ❤️)
Brunson Twitter
https://twitter.com/Brunso...
Brunson Telegram
https://t.me/BrunsonBrothe...
#MiraclesDoHappen
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Law & Physics
@physics171
20 February, 08:13
In response Kat istheSea3 to her Publication
"Just keep doing the same thing over and over, expecting different results"
Selling unlawful filings, the Brunsons are not following Lawful process, Due process of law.
The courts do not have standing, do not have subject matter jurisdiction.
The Brunson case is a political matter.
The Brunsons are suppose to be taking petitions to the legislative branch of Government, its the law as written.
Letters do not change the judicial branches choice of decision.
It's against the law for the judicial branch to hear the case, goes against a rule of law, the law of the land, the common law (Due Process of Law).
Deron Brunson has already learned what the facts are. Listen to Kirks Law corner, study the actual law.
So many are deceiving others.
Selling unlawful filings, the Brunsons are not following Lawful process, Due process of law.
The courts do not have standing, do not have subject matter jurisdiction.
The Brunson case is a political matter.
The Brunsons are suppose to be taking petitions to the legislative branch of Government, its the law as written.
Letters do not change the judicial branches choice of decision.
It's against the law for the judicial branch to hear the case, goes against a rule of law, the law of the land, the common law (Due Process of Law).
Deron Brunson has already learned what the facts are. Listen to Kirks Law corner, study the actual law.
So many are deceiving others.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Law & Physics
@physics171
20 February, 08:07
In response Kat istheSea3 to her Publication
"Just keep doing the same thing, expecting different results."
The Brunson Case does not have standing, does not have subject matter jurisdiction, the courts do not have lawful authority to hear the case.
If the courts hear the case its against the law...
The Brunson Case does not have standing, does not have subject matter jurisdiction, the courts do not have lawful authority to hear the case.
If the courts hear the case its against the law...
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Law & Physics
@physics171
20 February, 08:04
In response Kat istheSea3 to her Publication
Will SCOTUS merit the Brunson case?
https://rumble.com/v247r7u-will-scotus-merit-the-brunson-case.html
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
