Martin Geddes donated @martingeddes
27 January, 08:32
There must be an ethical foundation to being a "white hat". Is it that you...
- Must violate the free will of those who violate the free will of others
- Must not violate the free will of those who have the option to be sufficiently informed of the dangers of their choices
- Must take a "do unto others" approach in the grey area in the middle, guiding people away from danger and towards safety, but not taking on their karma
???

What is the foundation that keeps this all lawful in the widest scale and scope?

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Alcyone 777 @Alcyone
I was JUST typing in a thought stream on this subject under another's post and deleted it before publishing.

It's a loaded subject, which consumes many philosophical and Spiritual debate forums.

We are put to the test on this through our journey in duality.

We start our violating the free will of those who we want to stop from violating the free will of others.

Then we realize, "Oh shite, I am now karmically entangled with the person I wanted to control for controlling others, I took from them just the same, now what?"

We start practicing forgiveness to become untangled.

It gets grey as we reason, "Is informing with warning okay or is it still coming from a need to control?"

The final transition is Mastering non-interference in the way God/Natural Law does, which is not ignorance, yet rather achieving full awareness of the big picture which restores and makes us whole again. This phase is laden with residual guilt-based tottering and paradox.

Welcome to it.💛
02:51 PM - Jan 27, 2023
In response Martin Geddes to his Publication
Only people mentioned by Alcyone in this post can reply

No replys yet!

It seems that this publication does not yet have any comments. In order to respond to this publication from Alcyone 777, click on at the bottom under it