Vincent Kennedy⍟ donated @VincentKennedy
27 November, 11:22
Anyone have that video clip of Klaus Schwab mentioning some legal ramifications of getting the vaccine? Alluding to Vaxxed could be considered property theory.

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
JOHNNY ON THE SPOT @JOHNNYONTHESPOT
28 November, 06:00
In response Vincent Kennedy⍟ to his Publication

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Christine De7 @ChristineDe7
In a unanimous ruling, the US supreme court says that human genes cannot be patented, as DNA is a product of nature. But the court said synthetically produced genetic material can be claimed as intellectual property.

US pharmaceutical companies had previously warned that banning DNA patents would put investment in gene therapies at risk.

The compromise ruling over artificially copied DNA is expected to protect existing patents covering synthetic molecules.

Myriad Genetics is at the centre of the legal battle. The company argued that they had 'isolated' the specific cancer related genes thus making them susceptible to intellectual property laws, but their claim was struck down.

https://www.youtube.com/wa...
Human DNA can't be patented, US Supreme Court rules - YouTube

In a unanimous ruling, the US supreme court says that human genes cannot be patented, as DNA is a...euronews, the most watched news channel in EuropeSubscrib...

12:06 PM - Nov 28, 2022
In response JOHNNY ON THE SPOT to his Publication
Only people mentioned by ChristineDe7 in this post can reply

No replys yet!

It seems that this publication does not yet have any comments. In order to respond to this publication from Christine De7, click on at the bottom under it