27 November, 11:22
Anyone have that video clip of Klaus Schwab mentioning some legal ramifications of getting the vaccine? Alluding to Vaxxed could be considered property theory.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
JOHNNY ON THE SPOT
@JOHNNYONTHESPOT
28 November, 06:00
In response Vincent Kennedy⍟ to his Publication
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
In a unanimous ruling, the US supreme court says that human genes cannot be patented, as DNA is a product of nature. But the court said synthetically produced genetic material can be claimed as intellectual property.
US pharmaceutical companies had previously warned that banning DNA patents would put investment in gene therapies at risk.
The compromise ruling over artificially copied DNA is expected to protect existing patents covering synthetic molecules.
Myriad Genetics is at the centre of the legal battle. The company argued that they had 'isolated' the specific cancer related genes thus making them susceptible to intellectual property laws, but their claim was struck down.
https://www.youtube.com/wa...
US pharmaceutical companies had previously warned that banning DNA patents would put investment in gene therapies at risk.
The compromise ruling over artificially copied DNA is expected to protect existing patents covering synthetic molecules.
Myriad Genetics is at the centre of the legal battle. The company argued that they had 'isolated' the specific cancer related genes thus making them susceptible to intellectual property laws, but their claim was struck down.
https://www.youtube.com/wa...
12:06 PM - Nov 28, 2022
In response JOHNNY ON THE SPOT to his Publication
Only people mentioned by ChristineDe7 in this post can reply