26 October, 09:05
The military supplies provocation by its nature and design — blow stuff up and kill people. There is also a requirement for containment of the consequences. Anons are that structure — assembled with the help of the military, but performing an essential mission task that the military itself cannot perform.
"The calm before, during, and after the storm" is not some empty motivational phrase, but intrinsic to a strategy that minimises civilian casualties during the transition. We save the world through an absence of suicides, breakdowns, riots, uprisings, and uncivil war. Only civilians can keep wars sub-civil, it seems.
I met with a junior family member yesterday. It really strikes me how much we will be needed in the coming days when those "rudely awakening" realise those they trusted were criminals or fools, and those they mocked were just honest and perseverant.
The reward isn't vindication about the war, but a peaceful purpose in its resolution.
"The calm before, during, and after the storm" is not some empty motivational phrase, but intrinsic to a strategy that minimises civilian casualties during the transition. We save the world through an absence of suicides, breakdowns, riots, uprisings, and uncivil war. Only civilians can keep wars sub-civil, it seems.
I met with a junior family member yesterday. It really strikes me how much we will be needed in the coming days when those "rudely awakening" realise those they trusted were criminals or fools, and those they mocked were just honest and perseverant.
The reward isn't vindication about the war, but a peaceful purpose in its resolution.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
So true Martin! We send out ripples, each of us, wherever we find ourselves. I´m taking a second language class with 8 adult students (Turkish, Russian, British, Israeli, Greek, Russian/Ukrainian/Syrian, French, Spanish) this morning the discussion came to covid jabs.
I waited until all had told their own stories and points of view, teacher was pro vaccine, dangers of covid etc and that became the general agreement, all other students had had 3-4 jabs for various reasons. Then I told them I had taken no jabs nor PCR tests, shared early doubts on the narrative, questions and distrust of pharma with facts (shared)...data on jab injuries and deaths...
Then it got interesting... 4 out of 8 (50%) of the others added that they had regretted their decision, felt coerced, only 1 was staunchly defensive (family members in pharma/medicine) and claimed my claims were disinfo :) others joined in for 30 min with their own questions, doubts, concerns. Everything had shifted!
I waited until all had told their own stories and points of view, teacher was pro vaccine, dangers of covid etc and that became the general agreement, all other students had had 3-4 jabs for various reasons. Then I told them I had taken no jabs nor PCR tests, shared early doubts on the narrative, questions and distrust of pharma with facts (shared)...data on jab injuries and deaths...
Then it got interesting... 4 out of 8 (50%) of the others added that they had regretted their decision, felt coerced, only 1 was staunchly defensive (family members in pharma/medicine) and claimed my claims were disinfo :) others joined in for 30 min with their own questions, doubts, concerns. Everything had shifted!
09:43 AM - Oct 26, 2022
In response Martin Geddes to his Publication
Only people mentioned by wwg1wgaww in this post can reply
