Doq Holliday
@doqholliday
11 August, 06:08
If Americans had a fair vote on whether the IRS should exist or not, I’m highly confident most Americans would vote NO.
This tells you everything about what America has become.
That being said... once voting becomes unrigged you can kiss their ass goodbye! Maybe even before then.
This tells you everything about what America has become.
That being said... once voting becomes unrigged you can kiss their ass goodbye! Maybe even before then.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
the IRS is already an unconstitutional, unlawful, immoral fraud...
posting again:
The IRS is not a U.S. government agency. It is an agency of the IMF. Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I, Public Law 94-564, Senate report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391. (1996)
The IMF is an agency of the U.N. Black's Law Dictionary 6th Ed. p. 816.
The United States has not had a Treasury since 1921. 41 Stat. Ch. 214 p. 654.
The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF. Presidential Documents Volume 29 - No. 4 p. 113, 22 U.S.C. 285-288.
"I think if you were to go back and try to find and review the ratification of the 16th amendment, which was the internal revenue, the income tax, I think if you went back and examined that carefully, you would find that a sufficient number of States never ratified that amendment."
U.S. District Court Judge James C. Fox, Sullivan vs. United States, 2003.
posting again:
The IRS is not a U.S. government agency. It is an agency of the IMF. Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I, Public Law 94-564, Senate report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391. (1996)
The IMF is an agency of the U.N. Black's Law Dictionary 6th Ed. p. 816.
The United States has not had a Treasury since 1921. 41 Stat. Ch. 214 p. 654.
The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF. Presidential Documents Volume 29 - No. 4 p. 113, 22 U.S.C. 285-288.
"I think if you were to go back and try to find and review the ratification of the 16th amendment, which was the internal revenue, the income tax, I think if you went back and examined that carefully, you would find that a sufficient number of States never ratified that amendment."
U.S. District Court Judge James C. Fox, Sullivan vs. United States, 2003.
06:17 PM - Aug 11, 2022
In response Doq Holliday to his Publication
Only people mentioned by Hawkeye_Loccard in this post can reply
