Mike Anon @Mike314
once explained that the deep state demons
have to TELL US what they're going to do
[or are doing, what tech they have, money/bank SCAMS,
even 9-11, etc.]
& WE HAVE TO GIVE OUR APPROVAL
which is why they trick us into giving it.

The devil can't just TAKE your soul
you have to GIVE it.
So Hollywood magicians & spell casters
SHOW US ALL THE TIME what they're up to
& we agree by buying a ticket.
We've just been too asleep to realize their game.

🚗 Case in point
THE GUARDIAN 5-16-22
"US authorities have 'DISCOVERED'
an underground smuggling tunnel
on the California-Mexico border..."

https://amp.theguardian.co...

👆 Every fan of the FAST & FURIOUS films
saw those exact drug smuggling tunnels
in a 2009 F&F with Paul Walker 🏎️

MOVIES ARE DS DEMON DOCUMENTARIES
just FYI 😉

It Plain Deception
elusion of choice
u Cant give consent if not informed. without knowing the story plot
i mean you've never seen the movie before u bought the ticket, so how would u know your giving consent
u don't ,its on them they just tell u what there going to do like it! or not
there just mocking us
its up 2 choice of whether or not your buying the ticket after seeing advertising /promo/ maybe then that could b cons cued as consent but in my opinion it foggy at best re- informed consent
4 what its worth js🤔

Silence is consent to protect and support an unlawful system.
Anyone that choose to avoid solutions is the problem.
"Ignorance of law is not excuse"
People have supported corrupt fraudulent treasonous governments and corporations for far to long.
Why are people avoiding how to audit governments and corporations for lawful and legal compliance, for breaches and frauds of fiduciary duties?

To b Silent on something implies that u knew and did nothing i am saying is u cant know what u don't no!
Wanted Lack of Knowledge Perhaps applies in your regards to the issue
I Think Q Was Rite We All Have Been Sung A lullaby for a very long time
most dont even ingage in such conversations/topics? Critical thinking situations
I M O
interesting Parly with u on this topic ThankQ
.〰️ 🤔

In Law someone in a position to be lawful Example government, and corporate employees, they are all bound to know LAW whether they believe they are or not.
LAW, ignorance of law is no excuse.
The I didn't know does not matter, its actually evidence of not knowing, comprehending LAW in positions that must be lawful, positions that have obligations to know and comprehend law.

Example, there is no isolated purified Covid-19 virus, so that means everyone working for governments, corporations part of these COVID-19 crimes are guilty of many crimes.
When trials happen, LAW is not a presumption, not assumptions.
Ignorance is does not excuse crimes, colluding, conspiring, committing fraud, treason.
Governments and Corporation, their employees can try ignoring LAW and pretending they didn't know, Not knowing is not a viable excuse.
Imagine a whole world playing ignorance and get off Scott free from crimes they knowingly or unknowing where involved in?

I concur in this regard
If your in the position of u should and probably? must know the law especially when playing the game
ignorance of the law is no excuse >Benjamin Franklin
but back to the top of thread is the topic of (consent)
one must hav all the facts in order to give good conscience consent
that all i was trying convey
u cant convey consent without the full discloser of all the facts

Who is consenting, and not consenting?
Example Government employees, corporate employees?
Government and a lot of corporations are forcing policies, statutes, regulations, codes as laws, they are not laws.
LAW establishes who is consenting, silently or not silent.
BAR association members are colluding pulling the wool over peoples eyes with trickery
Governments and corporations, lots of them are human trafficking on many levels.
When the We The People follow blindly they silently consenting or willingly.
With government employees, corporate employees, that are human trafficking, yes many do not have full disclosure, perhaps most do not have full disclosure.
With positions of emolument, positions that are to be lawful, the consent games do not matter as there is obligations to learn, know, not trespass the rights of the people.
Its a big mess and people are going to pay a heavy price for blindly following.