Doq Holliday @doqholliday
29 December, 02:11
It appears that the following is happening:

Every bank is going to have to adopt digital assets plain and simple.

Ripple team knew this.

Banks either play ball or they die. They have huge problems anyway with gold and silver reserves. They play ball by commiting to digital wallets and the conversion protocol for fiat into digital.

So when the banks utilize CBDCs (Central Bank Digital Currencies) or some other token for smaller banks, they will need a protocol to convert FIAT into digital to be stored in customers digital wallets.

Because these are all tokens on the blockchain they will have to use a blockchain based protocol.

Well, just look at the fees with BTC, ETH. There’s no question this conversion protocol is going to be done using XRP due the .0001 fee.

Oh and by the way, XRP is not only built for this but is also using the ISO20022 standard whereas other tokens aren’t.

Are you grasping magnitude of this yet?

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Jan Jackson * * * @Jan_Jackson
If this digital thing is a very temporary bridge to screw the CBs, then fine. But I want CASH. I'll say it for the third time: JFK's EO11110 for starters. Gold and silver-backed dollars ($1, $2, $5, $10, $20, $50, $100, $500, $1000 bills), SILVER dollars, half-dollars, quarters and dimes, NICKEL nickels, COPPER pennies.

That's what will happen. It's real. It's tangible. It can be buried in the backyard if one so chooses. It doesn't appear only as a number on a computer fucking screen nor is it accessible only by using one of [THEIR] cards.

GOD: “Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls."

MOST PEOPLE: "We will not walk therein.”
03:14 PM - Dec 30, 2021
In response Doq Holliday to his Publication
Only people mentioned by Jan_Jackson in this post can reply

No replys yet!

It seems that this publication does not yet have any comments. In order to respond to this publication from Jan Jackson * * *, click on at the bottom under it