The Court has ordered the Gov't to disclose the identities of Maxwell's "unnamed co-conspirators" and here is where it gets interesting...
As of August 2020, the DOJ investigation of the co-conspirators "remained active."
Finally, one important question is still unanswered. Will any more of Epstein’s co-conspirator’s be prosecuted?
We can understand (but can’t fully answer) this question by looking to Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement.
This agreement, or plea deal, was unique. Not just because it was favorable and done in secret and kept secret from his victims and the public, but because it released Epstein’s known and unknown co-conspirators. From the non-prosecution agreement:
[T]he United States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova.
https://technofog.substack...
As of August 2020, the DOJ investigation of the co-conspirators "remained active."
Finally, one important question is still unanswered. Will any more of Epstein’s co-conspirator’s be prosecuted?
We can understand (but can’t fully answer) this question by looking to Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement.
This agreement, or plea deal, was unique. Not just because it was favorable and done in secret and kept secret from his victims and the public, but because it released Epstein’s known and unknown co-conspirators. From the non-prosecution agreement:
[T]he United States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova.
https://technofog.substack...
12:04 PM - Sep 05, 2021
Only people mentioned by Robertauthor in this post can reply
Michele Jeanne
@MicheleJeanne
05 September, 01:06
In response Robert Wakefield to his Publication
I don't get how there can be any such thing as a commitment to never prosecute anyone who was associated with someone.
It's one thing to say that testimonies from the case may not be used in future cases, it's quite another to grant blanket immunities to all contacts or co-conspirators (unspecified?) despite future evidence that may be revealed from other sources.
Just feels so wrong. Can't think of a legal basis though.
It's one thing to say that testimonies from the case may not be used in future cases, it's quite another to grant blanket immunities to all contacts or co-conspirators (unspecified?) despite future evidence that may be revealed from other sources.
Just feels so wrong. Can't think of a legal basis though.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Robert Wakefield
@Robertauthor
05 September, 01:21
In response Michele Jeanne to her Publication
I am hoping this is the Elite thinking we have got out of this one and then Boom by the way here`s your treason warrant
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
