Sabrina Gal
@Sabrinagal
22 August, 02:48
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Mary Donahue
@Stonesthrow57
23 August, 11:27
In response Sabrina Gal to her Publication
O+ is the universal donor.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
No, a person who is rh negative cannot accept any + blood type.
They will produce antibodies against the rh+ antigen, which is recognized as foreign to them.
O negative is the universal donor. O+ is still valuable as the majority of patients are rh+.
But the above post is somewhat of a myth anyway, as we inherit blood type from both parents. Even if the partner is also blood type AB-,, in the first generation only 50% odds of children being AB-, 25% will be A- and 25% B-. If anywhere down the line an rh+ marriage takes place, we'd start to see that creep in too.
ABxab -> Aa, Ab, aB, bB
They will produce antibodies against the rh+ antigen, which is recognized as foreign to them.
O negative is the universal donor. O+ is still valuable as the majority of patients are rh+.
But the above post is somewhat of a myth anyway, as we inherit blood type from both parents. Even if the partner is also blood type AB-,, in the first generation only 50% odds of children being AB-, 25% will be A- and 25% B-. If anywhere down the line an rh+ marriage takes place, we'd start to see that creep in too.
ABxab -> Aa, Ab, aB, bB
03:49 AM - Aug 24, 2021
In response Mary Donahue to her Publication
Only people mentioned by MicheleJeanne in this post can reply