Doq Holliday
@doqholliday
17 March, 01:48
I was pointing out fake B1d3n when he decided to run and we were all on Twitter.
The fakery was subtle at first and over time it has grown from a snowball into an avalanche.
I got burned out on pointing out all of this fakery a couple months before the election.
I see many many things and if I posted about them all it would be a full time job.
The real Biden was most likely executed like daddy bush and no name.
Do your own research.
The fakery was subtle at first and over time it has grown from a snowball into an avalanche.
I got burned out on pointing out all of this fakery a couple months before the election.
I see many many things and if I posted about them all it would be a full time job.
The real Biden was most likely executed like daddy bush and no name.
Do your own research.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
I had to be told to notice it, mostly because I didn't have a clear recollection of him from way back then and there was no side-by-side comparison.
In a sense, they took advantage of a neat feature of the human mind: ignoring details that won't benefit you.
If I see an apple then I see another slightly different apple, I won't invent a new word for that slightly different apple or claim it's a new kind of fruit, I'll just ignore the insignificant differences and assume it's also an apple.
Without this capacity, we would not be able to form groups or categories and thinking would be both very limited to strictly observational claims and also very teadious. We would be unable to do synthesis or understand commonalities (which is needed to have a grasp of metaphysical truths)
In a sense, they took advantage of a neat feature of the human mind: ignoring details that won't benefit you.
If I see an apple then I see another slightly different apple, I won't invent a new word for that slightly different apple or claim it's a new kind of fruit, I'll just ignore the insignificant differences and assume it's also an apple.
Without this capacity, we would not be able to form groups or categories and thinking would be both very limited to strictly observational claims and also very teadious. We would be unable to do synthesis or understand commonalities (which is needed to have a grasp of metaphysical truths)
09:38 AM - Mar 17, 2021
In response Doq Holliday to his Publication
Only people mentioned by JohnTiger in this post can reply
