Cee Cee©️
@The_exception
04 March, 11:32
I’m willing to bet this goes very bad for the Fed.
Spoiler alert: It’s Myanmar’s money to withdraw, and the money isn’t there.
Watch what happens.
Spoiler alert: It’s Myanmar’s money to withdraw, and the money isn’t there.
Watch what happens.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Alcyone 777
@Alcyone
05 March, 12:06
In response Cee Cee©️ to her Publication
What do you see happening?
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Looks like they don't have the liquidities to give them back their total amount, likely, they used most of Myanmar's cash for their own gain through investements. All the banks do this and by law, they are only obliged to keep a fraction of the money.
They should technically be able to use cash from other clients to pay back Myanmar but their refusal implies that they do not have this option.
This means that, it Myanmar insists, we may have a bank-run incoming at the fed level.
wow.
They should technically be able to use cash from other clients to pay back Myanmar but their refusal implies that they do not have this option.
This means that, it Myanmar insists, we may have a bank-run incoming at the fed level.
wow.
02:22 AM - Mar 05, 2021
In response Alcyone 777 to her Publication
Only people mentioned by JohnTiger in this post can reply
John Tiger
@JohnTiger
05 March, 02:31
In response John Tiger to his Publication
For the sake of thoroughness, a bank-run is a domino effect.
Like I said, no banks keep the full amounts of their clients, they are too busy to use YOUR cash to invest and profit from.
So if a bank does not have enough liquidities on hand to give out a withdrawal in full, it will have to actually withdraw/loan money from another bank.
If this bank doesn't have the liquidities, it will have to do the same thing... and so the dominoes fall.
I have to say though, there is probably a bank out there that does have 1B in stock so it's not a guarantied effect, just a possibility.
Like I said, no banks keep the full amounts of their clients, they are too busy to use YOUR cash to invest and profit from.
So if a bank does not have enough liquidities on hand to give out a withdrawal in full, it will have to actually withdraw/loan money from another bank.
If this bank doesn't have the liquidities, it will have to do the same thing... and so the dominoes fall.
I have to say though, there is probably a bank out there that does have 1B in stock so it's not a guarantied effect, just a possibility.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
John Tiger
@JohnTiger
05 March, 02:23
In response John Tiger to his Publication
grr typo... IF Myanmar insists
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
