Only followers of this user (Miss_Wide_Awake) can see their posts

slick roq @slickroQ
25 February, 01:06
In response Miss Wide Awake to her Publication
"Consent" of the governed is our clue.
State, unequivocally, that you do not consent. Three times, if needed.
This makes their violation of your rights under USC, Title 18, Sect. 242, willful. If they infolve others, Sect 241, also.
Be aware that your government ID ties your image to the Cestui Que Vie trust created in your name with your parents' signature on your birth certificate. Giving it to them makes your defense much more difficult.
(Continued)

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
slick roq @slickroQ
Demand to be informed of the CAUSE.
CAUSE creates jurisdiction for the court.
When demanding to be informed of CAUSE, the judge will try to give you "representation."
The 6thA says nothing of "representation." It does say you have a right to "assistance of counsel."
When you hire an attorney, who first duty is to the court, not his client, you waive being informed of the CAUSE, and you lose.
01:06 AM - Feb 25, 2021
In response slick roq to his Publication
Only people mentioned by slickroQ in this post can reply

No replys yet!

It seems that this publication does not yet have any comments. In order to respond to this publication from slick roq, click on at the bottom under it