1/4
🚨 RED ALERT: THE COLORADO STANDOFF (TINA PETERS HEARING)
DATE: January 15, 2026
STATUS: CRITICAL - FEDERAL INTERVENTION IMMINENT
THE SITREP:
Yesterday's hearing in the Colorado Court of Appeals was not a normal legal proceeding. It was a jurisdictional gunfight. The State of Colorado is trying to hold the line, but the federal "Pardon Power" is crashing the gates.
1. THE "FIRST AMENDMENT" TRAP
The appellate judges openly grilled the prosecution on the 9-year sentence.
The Intel: Judge Craig Welling warned the State: "We cannot punish her for her First Amendment rights."
Translation: The trial judge used Tina's "speech" (her exposing the machines) as a reason to lock her up. The appellate court knows this is a reversible error. If they admit the sentence was political, the whole case crumbles.
🚨 RED ALERT: THE COLORADO STANDOFF (TINA PETERS HEARING)
DATE: January 15, 2026
STATUS: CRITICAL - FEDERAL INTERVENTION IMMINENT
THE SITREP:
Yesterday's hearing in the Colorado Court of Appeals was not a normal legal proceeding. It was a jurisdictional gunfight. The State of Colorado is trying to hold the line, but the federal "Pardon Power" is crashing the gates.
1. THE "FIRST AMENDMENT" TRAP
The appellate judges openly grilled the prosecution on the 9-year sentence.
The Intel: Judge Craig Welling warned the State: "We cannot punish her for her First Amendment rights."
Translation: The trial judge used Tina's "speech" (her exposing the machines) as a reason to lock her up. The appellate court knows this is a reversible error. If they admit the sentence was political, the whole case crumbles.
05:22 PM - Jan 15, 2026
(E)
Only people mentioned by RealPersonJedi in this post can reply
Jennie West
@jenniewest
15 January, 11:07
In response Detective RedPanda17News to his Publication
High Five Panda😊
So Delighted to Behold 3 21's & an RV in your Cuddly, Playful Panda Pic😍😀😎
So Delighted to Behold 3 21's & an RV in your Cuddly, Playful Panda Pic😍😀😎
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Detective RedPanda17News
@RealPersonJedi
15 January, 05:23
(E)
In response Detective RedPanda17News to his Publication
2/4
2. THE "WHISKEY REBELLION" PRECEDENT
The legal team dropped a historical nuke: President Washington's 1795 Pardon.
The Argument: Washington pardoned state-level rebels to heal the nation. Trump's December 2025 pardon of Tina Peters operates on the same frequency.
The Conflict: Colorado refuses to recognize it. They are holding her in a "State vs. Federal" standoff that hasn't been seen since the Civil War.
3. THE FEDERAL INTERVENTION
The DOJ has officially filed a "Statement of Interest."
The Move: This signals that the Federal Government views her imprisonment as a potential "political retaliation."
The Escalation: The Federal Bureau of Prisons tried to take custody of Peters. Colorado refused. We are now in a "Custody Cold War."
2. THE "WHISKEY REBELLION" PRECEDENT
The legal team dropped a historical nuke: President Washington's 1795 Pardon.
The Argument: Washington pardoned state-level rebels to heal the nation. Trump's December 2025 pardon of Tina Peters operates on the same frequency.
The Conflict: Colorado refuses to recognize it. They are holding her in a "State vs. Federal" standoff that hasn't been seen since the Civil War.
3. THE FEDERAL INTERVENTION
The DOJ has officially filed a "Statement of Interest."
The Move: This signals that the Federal Government views her imprisonment as a potential "political retaliation."
The Escalation: The Federal Bureau of Prisons tried to take custody of Peters. Colorado refused. We are now in a "Custody Cold War."
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Detective RedPanda17News
@RealPersonJedi
15 January, 05:23
(E)
In response Detective RedPanda17News to his Publication
3/4
4. THE "TRUSTED BUILD" WAS A WIPE
The core truth remains: Tina Peters didn't "leak" passwords; she preserved the crime scene.
The Evidence: The forensic images she took prove the state's "Trusted Build" update wiped the 2020 adjudication logs.
The Law: 52 U.S.C. § 20701 requires 22 months of preservation. The State deleted it in 6. She followed the Federal Law; the State followed the cover-up.
4. THE "TRUSTED BUILD" WAS A WIPE
The core truth remains: Tina Peters didn't "leak" passwords; she preserved the crime scene.
The Evidence: The forensic images she took prove the state's "Trusted Build" update wiped the 2020 adjudication logs.
The Law: 52 U.S.C. § 20701 requires 22 months of preservation. The State deleted it in 6. She followed the Federal Law; the State followed the cover-up.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
