It all appeared too performative. The timing was off; the mannerisms were odd.

From AF2 transport, security guards hand signals, Psalms 46:1 bible verse, double meaning "G" ring, to buckle up post by Bukele, etc. it's all appearing to be a false flag style Psyop.
For what purpose? To destroy the leftists terrorists legally? To garner support for future operations? Influence and convert millions of middle of the road "asleep" people? Devolution? Something to think about.

Let's take a trip back to memory lane with one of the greatest false flags in recent history: Sandy Hook school shooting.

Robbie Parker, a father of a just slained child, goes on LIVE TV to talk about the shooting.
Evaluate his performative speech and its surrounding context.

Spoilers: It seriously one of the worst acting jobs I have ever seen in my life. He got caught during the switch up. Oops.

Treason. Anybody that participated in this false flag against us deserves to be in GITMO.

At times, nothing can add up to something.

“God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble.” Psalm 46:1

Q post 461

Mrs. Kirk told us

She apparently never had bleached eyebrows till that speech, not even for her wedding nor during her pageantry days, so why be at all concerned about that now, was that girl a stand in?

Its also still bugging me that the casket hands have no knuckle wrinkles. And the guys carrying him to the black vehicle to toss him inside… plus no dripping all over the place? No updates from the surgeon who tried?

May as well superglue this tin foil hat in place and hang on for the ride 🫨

I agree it felt "off" to me. In fact it made me uncomfortable and I had to leave the room for a few moments. My spirit was reacting to something being "out of cadence" or something. 🤔

Micheal Jaco says it was a False Flag

I immediately thought it was strange; very strange. The "performance" was mechanical, cold, even disturbing; she was all dolled up for the camera...

So, just like that she can talk so soon after the brutal, bloody assassination of her beloved husband, Charlie? Such a deep, tremendous love for this man and just like that she can stand in front of a camera, hair done, make up done, outfit ready, completely composed and with a written, prepared speech? Her "love story husband" was gunned down in broad daylight for the world to see and she just calmly reflects on the wonderful life she had with Charlie and their wonderful friends?? So fake. No tears, just bad acting. Cuddling his empty chair and those weird smiles mixed with eerie whispers..and let's not get started on the casket "mini-movie." Posting a video crying over your husband's corpse?
Bizarre theatrics.

Maybe I just don't understand this display of grief.

I am not clear who will be taking over or if it will be a coordinated effort. It could get interesting. Lots of media movement going on.

To me, she looked really angry. Since anger at the people who murdered her husband is a normal emotion in such circumstances, they probably just waited until she felt that way to film her remarks. She wanted to project strength to show the murderers their plan will backfire.

FYI, I was once being threatened by someone with a loaded shotgun… yet I was icy calm as I said to myself “I don’t think he’ll shoot me, but I suppose that’s what most people who get shot think.” I imagine some fear circuit in my brain was switched off as a survival instinct because calmness was my best hope. People don’t always react with the emotions you expect.

And the hand holding/touching in casket for propaganda, global consumption was beyond tasteless.

Agree, nothing "they" are trying to feed us adds up.