I am familiar with some of those experiments but also understand that biological weapons are used in wars and that vaccines were developed in part as a response to protect people from biological attacks. A country could end all vaccination but it would not stop another country from using biological weapons and wiping that population out. That is why I do support infectious disease research and medical research in general, but there needs to be oversight and sorting out who is who and what are they up to and cleaning up the dirty science (fake data or studies, fraudulent investigators or credentials, etc. that get pulled into legitimate research and muddle it up). Those all seem to be initiatives that they are trying to address although most of the public does not have context for the breadth and scope of this problem. The media has reported on quite a few individuals who have got caught trying to bring in foreign animals or pathogens and the FDA is also stepping up.

Your response is logical, reasonable, and well articulated. It is where I was 5 years ago.

It also assumes that the foundational science of virology and immunology are sound. I no longer believe they are. Richet discovered that it is impossible to immunize by injecting a protein into a mammal. His discovery was weaponized by eugenicists. What most think is a modern medical marvel is actually an intentional, subtle, slow poison attack.

Even if virology were what we've been told, the only bugs I've encountered in the USA were created in the USA with USA taxes.