Glenn Huggins @RnGFab60
12 July, 08:39

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
ol_ cowboy @ol_cowboy
EVERYONE NEEDS TO READ AND MEMORIZE THE OFFICIAL DEFINITION OF TERRORISM.

18 U.S. Code § 2331 - Definitions

ANYONE WHO THREATENS THE PUBLIC WITH ACTS THAT "involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life", LET ALONE COMMIT SUCH ACTS, WHICH ARE AGAINST THE LAW FALL INTO THIS CATEGORY AS DEFINED.

THE DEFINITION IS VERY BROAD.

ALSO ACTS MEANT "to intimidate or coerce a civilian population" ARE DEFINED AS ACTS OF TERRORISM...AND MORE.

WE ARE AT WAR OFFICIALLY,
THE WAR AGAINST TERROR.
(AUMF of 2001 not rescinded.)

https://www.law.cornell.ed...
12:18 PM - Jul 12, 2025
In response Glenn Huggins to his Publication
Only people mentioned by ol_cowboy in this post can reply
Just Mee @TrustinGod
16 July, 10:06
In response ol_ cowboy to his Publication
I'm imagining all the thugs using violence against ICE agents, being identified and arrested.

Knock knock!

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
ol_ cowboy @ol_cowboy
16 July, 11:49
In response Just Mee to his Publication
It's much broader than that.
For example, anyone pushing a Mask Mandate qualifies as a Terrorist.
How about Lawfare? Putting innocent people in prison to "intimidate or coerce" a population...
Wouldn't such acts of Terrorism also involve "Public Officials" so called?
Wouldn't weaponized "government" also be defined as Terrorism?

I say it does.
Not just Violent Acts, but Acts that fall under the definition of 18 U.S. Code § 2331.

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396