Bob Eddy Z
@falconeddyx
28 January, 12:22
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
If everyone received millions in back taxes refunds, the country would grind to a halt.
If you become a millionaire overnight, are you really going to go and stack supermarket shelves next day, are you really going to go and wipe the backsides of elderly folks, are you really going to drive an hour each way to work in the office job that you hate, are you really going to continue being a hospital porter when you really would like to be an artist.
All essential workers would just stop working.
I know I would.
The ones who are currently mllionaires and still work, they would continue working, but whatever it is that they do, it's not essential to society on an everyday basis.
Suddenly, the price of a loaf of bread would be $1000 because there wouldn't be much bread around, the price of a pack of bacon would be £2000 because abbatoir staff didn't bother coming in to work.
A basic car would be £300,000.
A small house, $2 million.
Not. Gonna. Happen.
If you become a millionaire overnight, are you really going to go and stack supermarket shelves next day, are you really going to go and wipe the backsides of elderly folks, are you really going to drive an hour each way to work in the office job that you hate, are you really going to continue being a hospital porter when you really would like to be an artist.
All essential workers would just stop working.
I know I would.
The ones who are currently mllionaires and still work, they would continue working, but whatever it is that they do, it's not essential to society on an everyday basis.
Suddenly, the price of a loaf of bread would be $1000 because there wouldn't be much bread around, the price of a pack of bacon would be £2000 because abbatoir staff didn't bother coming in to work.
A basic car would be £300,000.
A small house, $2 million.
Not. Gonna. Happen.
09:39 AM - Jan 29, 2025
In response Bob Eddy Z to his Publication
Only people mentioned by JazzyJoly in this post can reply
Carol Roberts
@InHisHolyName
29 January, 10:45
In response Jazzy Joly to her Publication
IMO, instant wealth would be detrimental, for the reasons you mentioned, and for society in general, because most would not know how to handle it. It would be better IMO to bring down this horrible inflation first, starting with food and utility costs, so people would have more purchasing power to make their finances go further. Then a gradual increase in income by eliminating the amount paid in taxes for instance. Then mortgage rates lowered so more can purchase a home. Higher returns in savings, increase in social security payments, decreased medical costs etc. Gradual ability to build wealth, not overnight wealth. 😇
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Jazzy Joly
@JazzyJoly
29 January, 12:39
In response Carol Roberts to her Publication
Exactly,
This is why everyone banging on about Nesara/Gesara for the last 8 years, and oooh, everyone worldwide is going to be rich, really get on my wick.
If everyone is rich then no one is rich, financially speaking.
Yes, I would like to see some refund coming, but only on an incremental basis. £/$1000 a month would suffice.
And yes, the reduction of the cost of everything else, energy costs, food, petrol/gas, homes, rent, everything.
That would be a much better scenario for society.
If I got given a shit load of money, I would gamble it away, and enjoy doing so, lolz, but obviously keep enough to live on for the foreseeable future.
But I would enjoy spending my days reading, crafting, watching crap, and playing bingo and slots online.
I would absolutely give up working right now if I could. I should be retired, if we didn't have such a corrupt uk government that is making us all work until we're 67 now, which will probably have moved to 70 by the time I get to 67.
This is why everyone banging on about Nesara/Gesara for the last 8 years, and oooh, everyone worldwide is going to be rich, really get on my wick.
If everyone is rich then no one is rich, financially speaking.
Yes, I would like to see some refund coming, but only on an incremental basis. £/$1000 a month would suffice.
And yes, the reduction of the cost of everything else, energy costs, food, petrol/gas, homes, rent, everything.
That would be a much better scenario for society.
If I got given a shit load of money, I would gamble it away, and enjoy doing so, lolz, but obviously keep enough to live on for the foreseeable future.
But I would enjoy spending my days reading, crafting, watching crap, and playing bingo and slots online.
I would absolutely give up working right now if I could. I should be retired, if we didn't have such a corrupt uk government that is making us all work until we're 67 now, which will probably have moved to 70 by the time I get to 67.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Bob Eddy Z
@falconeddyx
29 January, 10:32
In response Jazzy Joly to her Publication
Exactly, I think they will just show the fraud, eliminate the debt and we go to real hard asset based money. Some will not be happy, others that have protected their assets will do well. The fiat has ran it course.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Jazzy Joly
@JazzyJoly
29 January, 12:45
In response Bob Eddy Z to his Publication
Agree to all that.
Reduce the cost of living.
Make it feasible again that one income per family is enough to comfortably live on, so that families can be families again, and mum could just be mum, if that's what she wanted to do.
Society definitely started going down the pan when mum went out to work and the rise of latchkey kids.
I'm not saying revert to the 50's, but if mum or dad chose to be at home with the kids, then it should be doable, without stressing about not having two incomes.
Reduce the cost of living.
Make it feasible again that one income per family is enough to comfortably live on, so that families can be families again, and mum could just be mum, if that's what she wanted to do.
Society definitely started going down the pan when mum went out to work and the rise of latchkey kids.
I'm not saying revert to the 50's, but if mum or dad chose to be at home with the kids, then it should be doable, without stressing about not having two incomes.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
