3689
Dec 15, 2019 4:55:10 PM EST
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 6c75be No. 7517694
Dec 15, 2019 4:49:09 PM EST
Anonymous ID: 162f9b No. 7517634
ClipboardImage.png
We have three things issued at 1:29 aka Q-watch time:
>IG report
>Durham rebuttal
>Barr rebuttal
We have confirmation that there are no coincidences.
So that means one of three things:
1. Horowitz, Durham and Barr are all in communication with Q
OR
2. Horowitz, Durham and Barr were specifically directed by Q+ to issue their reports/rebuttals at precisely 1:29 PM ("Why, POTUS?" "You'll find out. Just do it.")
OR
3. Some combination of the above.
>>7517634
Time[ing] is important.
How many coincidences [use of coincidences essential not to violate NAT SEC?] before mathematically impossible?
FISA = START
Q
Dec 15, 2019 4:55:10 PM EST
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 6c75be No. 7517694
Dec 15, 2019 4:49:09 PM EST
Anonymous ID: 162f9b No. 7517634
ClipboardImage.png
We have three things issued at 1:29 aka Q-watch time:
>IG report
>Durham rebuttal
>Barr rebuttal
We have confirmation that there are no coincidences.
So that means one of three things:
1. Horowitz, Durham and Barr are all in communication with Q
OR
2. Horowitz, Durham and Barr were specifically directed by Q+ to issue their reports/rebuttals at precisely 1:29 PM ("Why, POTUS?" "You'll find out. Just do it.")
OR
3. Some combination of the above.
>>7517634
Time[ing] is important.
How many coincidences [use of coincidences essential not to violate NAT SEC?] before mathematically impossible?
FISA = START
Q
10:48 PM - Dec 14, 2024
Only people mentioned by Jimbo0566 in this post can reply