Cap'n Dan
@HIREmyHERO
22 November, 10:30
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Ask Yourself
@AskYourself_45
22 November, 07:14
In response Cap'n Dan to his Publication
Here is one…
https://youtu.be/prejBQ9jG...
https://youtu.be/prejBQ9jG...
Denver mayor suggests using Denver police to block mass deportations under Trump - YouTube
Denver Mayor Mike Johnston is facing scrutiny for comments he made, appearing to suggest he’d use Denver police to block federal officials from carrying out ...
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
What an IDIOT. Colorado Mayor must be smoking DOPE, cuz he is a DOPE. 😂
1) Most Police agree with Trump Policies, especially now, because they are being targeted everywhere by foreign Gangs & Cartels. Liberal policies endanger Law Enforcement as well as The People. They'll just call in sick!
2) NO "police force" has the power to stand up against the US Military in a military contest, period.
3) The Military has the power and authority under the Constitution to FORCE Police to stand down, because they are "policy enforcers" (that's where the word "police" derives from) of the foreign-owned corporations that pose as our governments in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 242.
Sheriffs are Constitutional.
US Marshals are Constitutional.
It is likely under NESARA that all good Police will be given a choice to join Sheriffs Departments or US Marshals.
4) To stand against the American Republic makes one an Unlawful Belligerent, and that's a really super-bad classification to be in.
1) Most Police agree with Trump Policies, especially now, because they are being targeted everywhere by foreign Gangs & Cartels. Liberal policies endanger Law Enforcement as well as The People. They'll just call in sick!
2) NO "police force" has the power to stand up against the US Military in a military contest, period.
3) The Military has the power and authority under the Constitution to FORCE Police to stand down, because they are "policy enforcers" (that's where the word "police" derives from) of the foreign-owned corporations that pose as our governments in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 242.
Sheriffs are Constitutional.
US Marshals are Constitutional.
It is likely under NESARA that all good Police will be given a choice to join Sheriffs Departments or US Marshals.
4) To stand against the American Republic makes one an Unlawful Belligerent, and that's a really super-bad classification to be in.
02:32 AM - Nov 23, 2024
In response Ask Yourself to her Publication
Only people mentioned by ol_cowboy in this post can reply
Ask Yourself
@AskYourself_45
23 November, 03:10
In response ol_ cowboy to his Publication
I commented on this video (more than once). There was some sheep lady in the comments section trying to play against some of our comments. This was my last comment from some hours ago that may have sent her crying with no further poking.
“I am liking this comments section, truly, it is great to start a good conversation about all this! My comment had to do with “criminals”, but maybe we can just start there. (Continued 👇)
“I am liking this comments section, truly, it is great to start a good conversation about all this! My comment had to do with “criminals”, but maybe we can just start there. (Continued 👇)
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Ask Yourself
@AskYourself_45
23 November, 03:11
In response Ask Yourself to her Publication
What is a crime and how does crime affect other people who just want to be safe or keep what is theirs from being stolen or damaged? We can interpret Title 8 USC 1324 to mean people who are inside our country without authorization, as well as those transporting them, those harboring them, those providing assistance for them, or those shielding them from detection… to be criminals punishable by fines and jail time. That said, protecting a city, protecting citizens, and investigating crime could be severely impacted by ordering a police force to thwart federal law instead of affording them full use of resources and thus depending on ICE to handle the burden of those who have already committed violent crimes. At a bare minimum, federal funding can be cut from our state if our elected officials do not comprehend what is at stake.”
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
ol_ cowboy
@ol_cowboy
23 November, 10:39
In response Ask Yourself to her Publication
Bigger than US CODE violations.
Bigger than Federal Law violations.
Bottom line IMO is that we are all in a Jurisdiction of Martial Law 24/7 & therefore subject to the UCMJ & that especially goes for public officials, who by such acts are engaging in Acts of Terrorism during a time of WAR.
I believe they may be classified as "terror cells" & we have to expand our thinking about the definition of "terrorism".
This Cabal & their minions THINK they have authority to violate the Constitution & go against the Republic when they don't 👉because the UCMJ (1775) is Superior even to Federal Law & because the LAWS OF ARMED CONFLICT apply. We are AT WAR, officially.
The AUMF (Authorization for Use of Military Force) of 2001 is bigger and broader than a formal Declaration of War, which is against Nations. THE WAR ON TERROR is universal.
Unprivileged Belligerents.
Undeclared Belligerents.
Unlawful Belligerents.
That means they have no protections under the Geneva Convention IMO.
Bigger than Federal Law violations.
Bottom line IMO is that we are all in a Jurisdiction of Martial Law 24/7 & therefore subject to the UCMJ & that especially goes for public officials, who by such acts are engaging in Acts of Terrorism during a time of WAR.
I believe they may be classified as "terror cells" & we have to expand our thinking about the definition of "terrorism".
This Cabal & their minions THINK they have authority to violate the Constitution & go against the Republic when they don't 👉because the UCMJ (1775) is Superior even to Federal Law & because the LAWS OF ARMED CONFLICT apply. We are AT WAR, officially.
The AUMF (Authorization for Use of Military Force) of 2001 is bigger and broader than a formal Declaration of War, which is against Nations. THE WAR ON TERROR is universal.
Unprivileged Belligerents.
Undeclared Belligerents.
Unlawful Belligerents.
That means they have no protections under the Geneva Convention IMO.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
