I agree with the explosives theory, possibly the art students, but only to create the impact scene and to get some fires going. I'm currently digging down Dr. Judy Wood's theory of #DirectEnergyWeapons and I must say it's really got me thinking. How have I not run across this already?! I thought controlled demolition and thermite for a long time too but where's the pancakes, where's the pile? Not enough debris for 500,000 tons (x2)! There's plenty of footage showing unburned intact sub level, so the 110 floors (x2) didn't pile drive below the surface. The evidence is right there. Most of the 3 buildings were turned to dust before hitting the ground. I've personally witnessed, on a much smaller scale, buildings collapse due to fire and controlled demolitions on the job but the destruction of this scale should've left a much much bigger pile. Anybody have thoughts on this?

Pics I picked up over the yrs.
Bush & BiBi = 911

Yes, great points! i agree that they used a number of techniques, including Thermite to achieve the rough outlines of the planes "striking" the buildings. ...and yes DEWs had to have occurred due to the lack of debris remaining after the controlled demolitions.
I strongly believe President Trump has the documents that have been (or will be) de-classified and the truth will finally revealed sooner rather than later (JFK, and other classified material as well).