😻 The decision I MOST want to hear out of SCOTUS tomorrow
is Brunson 🙏🇺🇸

👇 Recap

⚖️ Juan O Savin
BRUNSON v ADAMS
is a case against 385 persons in Congress + Biden, Harris & Pence.
The people named in the suit voted to certify the 2020 Election.
A group led by Sen Ted Cruz
had asked for a 10-day review to determine
whether the Election had been attacked as an Act of War
by outside forces to affect the outcome.
Congress did not take the 10-days to review.
There is an 1877 case that is the precedent.
Anybody in Government service
swears an oath to protect the Constitution
FROM ALL ENEMIES FOREIGN & DOMESTIC.
The fact that congress certified the vote without VERIFYING
meant they didn’t protect the citizens’ Constitutional Right
to fair representation.
This is a Treasonous act.
THE REMEDY IS
THEY CAN NO LONGER HOLD OFFICE 💥

🇺🇸👇 Ariel @ Prolotario1 on SCOTUS upcoming decisions
https://www.axios.com/2024...

I think a bunch of them didn't even take the oath for that matter.
Kinda disqualifies them from their positions from day 1.
Illegally certifying the election.
Not sure if that's another or the same crime.
Any way you slice it
They're done
Public eyes.
Military rule anyways so this is moot.
Good for the public to see it play out though
That's the point of this movie/documentary anyway isn't it?

I think you're 💯 Karl.
Military is the only way & that's where we're headed.

As I understand it the Brunson case
has already been heard & decided by SCOTUS.

I just would LOVE to see
388 TRAITORS marched out of...
wherever they are cuz it ain't WA DC‼️

Talk about a Scene from a Blockbuster Movie
THAT would be AMAZING cinema 🎥🍿