Angels Here -Z donated @SirHuckleberry
28 November, 06:40
Perhaps someone here that is still on X can take a post to DoQ from Nana to trend.
#ArmUpAmerica

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Bennastix Anon donated @Bennastix
28 November, 07:56
In response Angels Here -Z to her Publication
What would you like taken? I will be glad to😊

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Angels Here -Z donated @SirHuckleberry
29 November, 12:11
In response Bennastix Anon to her Publication
Just that Hashtag
#ArmUpAmerica

In the coming weeks and months, with all the illegals that have come thro in the last 3 yrs, I really think we are going to need to protect ourselves in many areas thro out the country until the military can get a grip on them.

I feel certain many are paid terrorists just waiting to be activated, most likely in large cities at first but depending on where you are in the country overflow may also hit smaller towns and cities.

Not putting out fear, just warning people to always be prepare to protect themselves and families.
Being armed, strong, and prepared alone takes away a huge amount of fear.

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Doctor Precipice @DrPrecipice
29 November, 02:15
In response Angels Here -Z to her Publication
The real question is, are we actually allowed to "kill" an individual(s) in the event it happens. Are we backed lawfully (US or USA INC.) to be vindicated for such a scenario.

I am not advocating to kill, just in the scenario the one has to protect themselves, that if "White Hats are in Control" or "Black hats have control". It comes down to law and knowing who controls the Law (I believe it's military law) what are our rights to do it and what is being looked at when we do it.

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
WIPatriot IRL @QualityorQuantity
It may depend on whether the State one lives in has a 'Duty TO Retreat' component in their self defense laws.

I live in WI which does not.

However, a judge is allowed to consider if one could have retreated to determine if the use of deadly force was necessary.. ⬅️

"Self-defense is an affirmative defense that a person accused of a violent crime can bring, arguing that their use of force was justified because they were defending themselves. Wisconsin law allows deadly force in self-defense in the limited circumstances where the person defending themselves “reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm” to their person. Importantly, some states impose a duty to retreat from a conflict, but Wisconsin is not among them. However, Wisconsin does allow juries to consider whether a defendant could have retreated in determining whether the use of deadly force was “necessary.”

Source: see pic.
12:42 AM - Nov 30, 2023 (E)
In response Doctor Precipice to his Publication
Only people mentioned by QualityorQuantity in this post can reply

No replys yet!

It seems that this publication does not yet have any comments. In order to respond to this publication from WIPatriot IRL, click on at the bottom under it