Casey Turnup
@CaseyTurnup
01 November, 04:09
The 13th Amendment: On December 6, 1865, the present 13th amendment was added to the U.S. Constitution. That amendment deals with slavery. But it should have been the 14th amendment. Instead, history was re-written, and the original 13th amendment was removed from the public record. The original 13th amendment put teeth in a provision already in the constitution–the prohibition against American citizens holding titles and honors.
The Constitution prohibits it, but the thirteenth amendment designated a penalty. Loss of citizenship. This amendment was stricken from the record by lawyers in America.
Did you know that when American lawyers become members of the BAR Association they are being recognized by the British Accredited Registry? That’s what “BAR” stands for. So, they join a foreign organization and are awarded the title “Esquire.” This is illegal under the constitution, and if the original 13th amendment were in effect, all members of the BAR would lose their citizenship.
The Constitution prohibits it, but the thirteenth amendment designated a penalty. Loss of citizenship. This amendment was stricken from the record by lawyers in America.
Did you know that when American lawyers become members of the BAR Association they are being recognized by the British Accredited Registry? That’s what “BAR” stands for. So, they join a foreign organization and are awarded the title “Esquire.” This is illegal under the constitution, and if the original 13th amendment were in effect, all members of the BAR would lose their citizenship.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
I think they will dis-BAR them and retrain them as common law/constitutional lawyers (?) that is what I heard, "re-train" if they are clean, you know what I mean.
05:35 PM - Nov 01, 2023
(E)
In response Casey Turnup to her Publication
Only people mentioned by Catadelle in this post can reply
Casey Turnup
@CaseyTurnup
01 November, 07:28
(E)
In response Catherine Adelle to her Publication
Yes ..they will ALL be retrained for CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.
I have noticed many more Judge shows on TV formatted for educational learning.
Instruction is being given in the shows as to
WHAT THE LAW SAYS..as well as REPEATEDLY asking where's your evidence, contract, police report, documents...
Love judge Judy she asks questions and stops "STORY" for Yes or No answer.
Judge Ross is really good listening and also explaining so people learn.
There is a marked increase of Law info provided...
Judge Judy says when emoting begins.
"This is not Dr Phil."
I have noticed many more Judge shows on TV formatted for educational learning.
Instruction is being given in the shows as to
WHAT THE LAW SAYS..as well as REPEATEDLY asking where's your evidence, contract, police report, documents...
Love judge Judy she asks questions and stops "STORY" for Yes or No answer.
Judge Ross is really good listening and also explaining so people learn.
There is a marked increase of Law info provided...
Judge Judy says when emoting begins.
"This is not Dr Phil."
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
